Thursday, January 31, 2019

References to Articles on Capitalism and Socialism


References to Articles on Capitalism and Socialism

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/08/does-capitalism-cause-poverty/   Good article measuring the effects of capitalism on poverty


https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/upshot/the-formula-for-a-richer-world-equality-liberty-justice.html  Liberalism referenced here is classical liberalism, not the current brand of leftist progressivism




Benefits of capitalism
  1. In general, capitalism produces more wealth.
  2. Capitalism actively rewards positive traits like hard work and ingenuity. Similarly, it punishes negative traits such as laziness and theft.
  3. Capitalism is more compatible with democracy than other systems. In fact, there are few republics or democracies in the modern world that are not capitalistic.
  4. Capitalism is more compatible with freedom of speech and Christianity than alternative systems.
  5. Free markets are the natural state of trade. Unlike socialism, which requires government interference, capitalism can develop naturally. Therefore, capitalist societies tend to have smaller governments.
  6. Free markets can conduct certain functions that are normally handled by the government. Therefore, capitalist societies tend to be more efficient and free from government control.
  7. The competition between markets and businesses will create more productivity in the work place, allowing the rate of technological innovation to increase. This will cause the society to advance while the costs of goods and services will decrease.
  8. Governments in capitalist societies tend to generate more wealth, since more wealth is being produced. Therefore, capitalist societies tend to be stronger.
  9. Capitalist societies usually do not have large black markets. Therefore, capitalist societies tend to have less crime.
  10. Capitalist nations promote free trade allowing more nations to cooperatively work together for more economic liberty. This will likely mitigate disputes between nations.


Socialism - (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.

https://mises.org/wire/socialism-worlds-greatest-generator-poverty  Good article on socialism & millennials’ attraction to it.







https://eand.co/how-capitalism-made-americans-poor-and-socialism-made-europeans-rich-6eb7b52353a  Very thoughtful and thought-provoking article on European “socialism” vs American “capitalism”.  It’s not really socialism in Europe.  It’s high tax, hign level of social services.

Ray Gruszecki
January 21, 2019

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Racism and Trump

Racism and Trump

I’ve tried to reconcile in my mind whether Donald Trump has been, and continues to be, truly a racist individual. i.e. does Trump feel that whites are superior to other races, and does he take actions to marginalize those races.  He has stated on many occasions that all Americans, regardless of race or ethnic background are equal under the law.  By his actions in government, he has improved the economic status of all Americans, and he is particularly proud of raising the economic standards of black and Hispanic Americans.  So by these standards of his stated beliefs and actions, he is not a racist.

Trump’s many (90%) detractors in the mainstream media cite the numerous times that he has spiced his rhetoric with racially inappropriate comments, as indeed he has.  Of particular objection were his comments during the Charlottesville riots that there were some decent folks on both sides of the argument, and that there were rioters opposing the white supremacists that were as bad as the white supremacists. Can these truisms be held as racist statements?  Also cited is Trump’s long record of being picked up, on open mike, of being inappropriately racial.

Without seeming too much to condone his blurting of racial epithets, let’s remember Trump’s background as an Eastern U.S. and NYC construction contractor and later as a media personality. Past generations of people from the northern parts of the country like the Bronx and Queens were much more aware of their ethnic backgrounds than in other parts of the country or in the present day.  Sometimes this resulted in an under-current of racism, but for the most part it served as good-natured pride in ones origins.  For the most part, people were pragmatic, and looked at results, rather than someone’s last name or the color of their skin.  Derogatory epithets like “wop” or “polack” or “kraut” or “mick”, and yes, “nigger” were there, but many times not used in a truly hateful manner.

And of course, eventually, the world changed as minorities sought true equality, and we mostly stopped calling each other these colorful names.  Along with the recent phenomenon of political correctness, came the “social justice” police or identity nazis, who picked up every nuance of these once pretty harmless ethnic nicknames as egregious racial slurs, and “exposed” them on the broadcast and social media.  Such that any “slips” from Trump or other septuagenarians steeped in the past verbiage of ethnicity, became unpardonable displays or “dog whistles” of the horrors of racism and worse.

It is increasingly obvious that leftists reduce much of what they deem as objectionable in society to “racism”.  They manufacture supposed transgressions from what were originally quite innocent words and actions, and paint them with derogatory accusations that liberal activists try to make part of our culture and society.  So calling Trump a racist falls on somewhat deaf ears, since the left tries to paint anyone that disagrees with them as “racist”

So is Trump a racist?  I think the best answer is that he is no more racist than anyone his age and  background.  He has put his foot (or his thumbs) in his mouth, and has been caught verbalizing some racially inappropriate things.  His actions, on the other hand have not shown him to be racist, and in fact he has done more for the economic well-being of minorities than most of his predecessors. The old saw “actions speak louder than words” seem appropriate here, particularly when the words are 30+ years old, in some cases, or are sourced from heated campaign rhetoric.

This is a good dissertation on the differences between individual and group racism and the societal effects.



Ray Gruszecki
Jan 29, 2019

Comments on Culture Wars, Abortion


Comments on Culture Wars, Abortion



It has to be obvious to anyone that we have been engaged in a culture war for the last 30 years.  There has been a drift away from traditional and religious values toward more liberal mores concerning abortion, legalization of drugs, special privileges for identity groups, secularization and other societal issues.



The expression "culture war" entered the vocabulary of United States politics with the publication of Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America by James Davison Hunter in 1991. Hunter perceived a dramatic realignment and polarization that had transformed United States politics and culture, including the issues of abortion, federal and state gun laws, global warming, immigration, separation of church and state, privacy, recreational drug use, LGBT rights, and censorship.



Whilst this liberalization has proceeded apace, regardless of the country’s political leadership, it has mostly been within the framework of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  Until Trump, that is.  Suddenly, the anger at Trump by the left, stemming from his “surprise” election, and fueled by his apolitical disregard of the niceties of Washington posturings, has turned much of the leftist opposition into mob-like anti-constitutionalist, anti-rights, near anarchists, using violence, rather than reason, to further their aims.  And unfortunately, most of the mainstream media in the country skews the news to make this “mob” and its actions “righteous”, and any opposition to it “villainous”.



Trump and his minions, and what few honest media outlets exist, continue to oppose and expose this inexorable and cynical and many times false, leftist drumbeat, and one can only hope that that unaligned middle of the electorate is astute enough to see the truth and act on it.



There are spirited disagreements about where our culture is going, but two particularly egregious effects of the leftist attacks on traditional values concern the anti-religious diatribes now popular amongst activist leftists like Kamela Harris, and the generic leftist praising of abortion as a woman’s “health right”.



Leftists have taken a belligerent and decidedly anti-religious (and particularly, anti-catholic) posture in congress, on the streets and in the media.  Recent examples are Harris’ anti K of C comments when questioning federal district court Nominee Brian Buescher, and the false smear by the media against Covington Catholic students in Washington, DC.  Religious leaders and people of religion should be aware of this insidious and sometimes violent movement against religion and religious beliefs.



The other concerns abortion, which is the law of the land, and which, according to Pew Research, “as of 2018, public support for legal abortion remains as high as it has been in two decades of polling. Currently, 58% say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 37% say it should be illegal in all or most cases”.



Real science posits that life begins when the cell divides and a new DNA entity (the zygote) is formed.  Notwithstanding a raft of leftist, pseudo-scientific arguments, the zygote is the first form of a human being, and will develop into the full form of a human being if left alone.  Aborting it means killing life.  There is no other way to say it.



Ray Gruszecki

Jan 23, 2019

Culture Wars

Culture Wars

What absurdities will we next see in this inexorable movement away from some semblance of sanity, toward a topsy-turvy world based on such newspeak mores as “social justice”, “political correctness”, “gender diversity”, “#metoo awareness”, “masculine toxicity”, and on and on.

Now I’m an old curmudgeon who has lived a long time and seen many past social trends.  That doesn’t mean that I’m stuck in the past or in any way partial to it, or that I can’t think rationally.
But frankly these last 20 years of millennial liberal and leftist thinking has defied all reason and common sense.  The overall result is to drive the democrat party, always in the past the sturdy blue collar opposition to corporate over-reaches, to become an aristocratic elite, dictating what is good for “the great unwashed”.

This cultural trend has resulted in a world-wide surge of populism and typically right wing backlash against the “social justice” elitists. Ready examples are Brexit, Trump’s election in the U.S., European right wing parties such as UKIP in Britain, AfD in Germany, Lega Nord in Italy and many others.

So we have the leftist social justice movements, based originally on humanitarian concerns, but overtaken by elitist, in your face, “we know better”, thinking on the one hand, and a reactionary, populist, almost Fascist opposition on the other hand, with social media fueling both with memes and pithy derogations.

Treading the cultural waters these days is somewhat problematic, particularly for someone born and raised in the rough and tumble society of rural Massachusetts, Boston and New York City in the 1930’s, 40’s and 50’s.  Back then we knew that all people were equal and were to be treated that way, regardless of color or ethnic background or sexual orientation.  We did not believe that certain groups required special privileges because some past harm had been done to them by a prior society.  We believed that men who abused women, in any way, should be prosecuted. We were not confused about two sexes, or which bathroom to use.  We would never question that marriage was for one man and one woman. 

Now all of the most nonsensical things relating to social justice and political correctness that I enumerated are  being rammed down our throats by the cultural elitists and political activists, legislated by increasingly leftist democrats in congress and upheld by the courts (typically the Ninth Circuit).

One can argue that the line for common sense and decency is being held by republicans and conservatives in our congress and SCOTUS, but if this were only a political movement.  The movement is cultural, secular, anti-religious.  It has overtaken most of our universities and entertainment and urban thinking.  All we can do is continue to stress pragmatic, common sense, American values in our own cultural interactions.





We laugh and joke and create memes about how naïve and air-headed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has come across in some of her recent postures and statements.  But beyond the “bless her hearts” and condescension looms a deadly serious point of fact – Ocasio-Cortez, and many of her millennial cohorts don’t seem to have a clue as to the historical failure of socialism-communism-Marxism-collectivism-statism, and their offshoots.  They seem to be blissfully unaware that the “socialism” brand has never worked anywhere, at any time, and has, in fact resulted in unspeakable suffering and death wherever it has been attempted.

Venezuela is the most recent example of the degradation of the richest country in South America a quarter century ago to people eating from garbage cans for sustenance right now because of unchecked “socialism”.  One can easily reference the suffering and loss of lives caused by socialism/communism in Europe, Asia, the Soviet Union and China in the 20th century.

Some will say, “what about Nordic socialism that seems to work so well”?  Ask a Dane or Swede or Norwegian if they are socialist, and they will laugh you out of their highly capitalist countries.  They have had 70% taxes and cradle to grave care for their hard-working and homogenous populations, but they are strongly capitalist, rather than socialist.

There is a real danger that we can truly be afflicted by the socialist curse, particularly when old Marxists like Bernie Sanders take up the cause, and since many leftist beliefs concerning identity politics, globalism, income equality dovetail so neatly with the socialist agenda.




Just when you think you’ve seen everything in our Washington, D.C. circus, along comes the current crop of green (sic) congressional social justice, socialist democrat warriors, ostensibly led by (all of 29 years old),  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, also known by the initialism, AOC.

She is a social media phenomenon, as I’m sure anyone’s millennial granddaughter who was suddenly elected to congress, who had thumbs, and a voice, and who was somewhat photogenic, would be.  Already, one of her accomplishments is to teach some of those congressional septuagenarians the intricacies of Twitter and Instagram.

Congresspersons are law makers, and most of its members have law degrees.  AOC’s BA degree from Boston University is in economics, and she is ever so proud of it, going around asking  “ I wonder how many other members of congress have degrees in economics like I do?”

Her pronouncements on proposed government programs and budgets makes one wonder how much attention she was paying in those college economics classes.  Among other things, she does not seem to know where the commas and decimals go in large numbers.

But that’s not all.  AOC has been steeped in the rhetoric and dialogue, not only of leftist “social justice” and “political correctness”, but also of “democratic socialism”, the current incarnation of Marxist thought.  So what comes out of her stream of consciousness is a continuing diatribe of high blown social programs that (at least currently), have no chance of either political or economic (sic) success.

AOC's response to any kind of criticism of her far out ideas is to play the "woman" card or the "person of color" card.  She is unashamedly bigoted, and tries to reverse that bigotry.

When she first made the national scene by beating Joe Crowley in the New York 14th congressional district primary, the reaction to her inane TV pronouncements were “what an idiot”, or, in Texas, “well bless her soul”.  It was evident though, that this person and what she represented politically could be extremely toxic, and I wrote as much on social media back then.

This has been borne out as the 116th congress convened.  AOC has become a touchstone and  icon for the movement of the democrat party toward the extreme left and toward Marxist “democratic socialism”.  Her vocalisms and social media activity emphasize her role as the “darling of the extreme left”.  Her antics in the halls and corridors of congress, “seeking Pelosi”, “where’s Mitch?” have kept her in the news.  She seems to have taken a lesson from another charismatic New Yorker who sits just up the road, and also knows how to use his thumbs.

Ray Gruszecki
Jan 15, 2019


Blockchain Technology Links & References


Blockchain Technology Links & References



Many futurists and thinkers posit that Blockchain will be the next evolutionary development of how we handle future trillions of transactions and the security and trust around these transactions.  Blockchain will replace financial institutions, the internet and many trappings of our modern transactional infrastructure.  Someone asked me to describe Blockchain in a few words.  Blockchain are encrypted, distributed, immutable ledgers of transactions with security for these ledgers embedded, and changeable only by a large amount of effort.  References follow, including a 20 minute Ted Talk on Blockchain.















Links for Further Research on Blockchain Technology



Public key cryptography explained








Blockchain

http://graphics.reuters.com/TECHNOLOGY-BLOCKCHAIN/010070P11GN/index.html



















Peer to Peer





Mining







Ray Gruszecki

Dec 31, 2018

On “The Caravan(s)”


On “The Caravan(s)”



Well researched article on the “caravan” of some 10,000 migrants advancing on the U.S. through Mexico, which cuts past both the left and right wing rhetoric, and focuses on the facts.  Commenting on the 800 U.S. military troops being sent to the border, 



“The soldiers aren't going to the border to stop the caravan. They're going to assist Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Health and Human Services, and other authorities as they take in the newcomers. There is little the government can do to turn back the tide. Why? Because the same rule of law challenged by illegal immigration also incentivizes and protects the illegal immigrants within the caravan. It's a paradox—one inflaming this most polarizing of issues at a moment of political decision.”



Also – “The military can't solve the problem. But Congress can. Only the legislative branch has the authority to close the loopholes through which the most recent illegal migration has passed: a portion of the 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act that limits the ability of law enforcement to repatriate swiftly unaccompanied children from noncontiguous (read: Central American) nations; the 1997 Flores settlement that put a ceiling on how long the government can detain these children; and the "credible fear" standard by which illegal immigrants may request asylum proceedings simply by saying they are afraid to return to Tegucigalpa or Quetzaltenango.”












Why don’t we first express our feelings of compassion and do something for our own American citizens who are suffering, for example multitudes of homeless American war veterans, who are suffering in our cities?  A mobile mob organized by leftist activists in Central America or Venezuela demanding illegal entry into our country and fueled by a political agenda can only be called an invasion.  The Mexicans tried to process them legally, and they broke down the barriers at the Guatemala border, breached the river, and continued North in mob-like fashion.



One cannot fail to be touched by the suffering humanity inherent in such an exodus.  The leftist organizers and unfortunately, the mainstream media, know this, and take advantage, particularly by putting pregnant women and children in front of the mob, to elicit maximum howls from well-meaning, but ill-informed people.



We are a country of immigrants whose ancestors got here legally, within the systems and by obeying the immigration laws.  Millions have recently come here legally after studying and meeting our citizenship requirements.  I’ve seen numbers like 1.8 million people in Central America who want to immigrate to this country.  We simply cannot just allow them to come in illegally because they form a mobile mob and prey on our sympathies.



I have seen in my travels, atrocities beyond belief.  In the Far East, children are purposefully maimed so that they can be more effective beggers by appealing to the kind natures of wealthier westerners.  The unprincipled coyotes organizing these “caravans” use similar tactics to ensure that our heart-felt sympathies are engaged.  They don’t maim kids, but they take advantage of every heart-tugging device they can think of.



In this particular situation, I don’t think that we should close the border.  I think that we should appeal to Mexico and the U.N. to provide humane temporary living conditions for this crowd, until they can be processed either as refugees, allowed to immigrate to the U.S. (or Mexico), or returned to their countries of origin.  It seems that they are being sustained so far, by well-meaning Mexican citizens.  The Red Cross and other humane organizations will probably be required if they spend weeks and months on the road.



Ray Gruszecki

October 27, 2018

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Democratic Socialism


Democratic Socialism



This is a story for Democrats, particularly Bernie, Kamela and AOC backers, and also for idealistic millennial backers of democratic socialism.  The story does not derive from loud backers of conservatism like Hannity or Ingraham on Fox News, or from conservative pundits like Rich Lowry or David French or Jonah Goldberg on National Review.  It is simply the sad story of Venezuela and its decline into socialism.



Venezuela before Hugo Chavez was one of the wealthiest countries in South America.  It had oil and mineral riches and self-sustaining agriculture.  Its per capita GDP was close to $18,000 per annum pre-Chavez.  It is about $12,000 now, but this really doesn’t tell the whole story.  People are literally starving now, and have lost an average of 20 lbs per person across the 31 million population.  Venezuela is a failed state.  People are attempting to leave.  They are being shot in the streets.



What happened?  Socialism happened, along with the ill-conceived social projects, corruption, cronyism and other trappings of Chavez’ and Maduro’s socialist governments, and the inevitable decline of socialism and communism into brutal, totalitarian regimes



Venezuela is just one recent example of the corrosive and debilitating nature of socialism/ communism, which has never been successful in the last one hundred years, and has resulted in over 100 million deaths over that period. 



Quoting a recent article in “Investors Daily”,



 Sadly, a mere 28 years after the collapse of communism, a new generation of youth not then born or too young to understand it see that epochal event as ancient history, irrelevant to their new understanding of the world.   It seems even among adults, the lessons of the Cold War and of more than 100 years of tragic socialist history have been entirely lost.

There has never been a successful socialist government in history. None. Everywhere socialist precepts are put in place, poverty, loss of freedom and rights, and societal decline inevitably follow. Collapse is a frequent result.

Second, socialist governments are murderous. According to the "Black Book of Communism," written by French former Marxist Stephane Courtois, socialist regimes killed over 100 million people during the 20th century. No other ideology or "ism" came close to that blood-soaked record.

Whether it's the USSR, China, Cuba, Vietnam, the former East Germany, North Korea, Laos, Nicaragua, Zimbabwe, Cambodia, Venezuela or any of the other failed experiments in socialism, it's never worked anywhere. It's led only to misery, deprivation, government control and a loss of basic human rights.”

We should not be led astray by the easy mottoes of democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders, Kamela Harris and newcomer Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  “Free health care”, “free education”, “free” borders and special privileges for sub groups sound good to impressionable ears.  History shows that these are the harbingers of eventual socialist disaster.



Ray Gruszecki

October 18, 2018