Friday, March 11, 2016

The European Right Wing



The European Right Wing

There is a troubling phenomenon that has been taking place throughout Europe over the past several years.   This is the rise of neo fascist, eurosceptic political parties in nearly all European countries.  Much of this trend is populist in nature, and seems a distant cousin of the Trump and Sanders movements in the U.S.

 I watch TV directly from Europe over IPTV and several things have become recently apparent.  Firstly, Europe has a migration and refugee issue of massive proportions.  Even before the dangerous anarchy in Syria and Libya, Europe was facing “Islamization”, the influx of Muslims into Europe on a large scale.  This has caused xenophobic, anti-Muslim reactions even before the current migration crisis.  Recent books by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, “Infidel”, “Heretic”; Geert Wilders, “Marked for Death”; and Bruce Bawer “While Europe Slept” expound on this phenomenon in some detail.

Secondly, some members of the European Union are going broke paying for their socialization programs.  They can’t have high minimum wages, 30 hour work weeks, 6 weeks of vacation, “free” schooling, medical care, strong social services and other social amenities, and then couple all this with a weak work ethic and pervasive corruption, and expect a country and an economy to thrive.  Countries like Greece, Spain and even Italy and France to some extent are beginning to realize that they need to “pay the piper”.  And Germany is increasingly tired of supporting the above inefficiencies.  Even the Scandinavian countries are not models of the utopian socialism they were once thought to be.

Thirdly, unrest in the population arises in the weaker countries from their reluctance to impose austerity measures to rebalance their economic systems, and unrest also arises in the stronger countries because they don’t want to pay for their poorer cousins’ excesses.  This opens the way for neo fascist, anti-Schengen, xenophobic “country firsters”.  Some are relatively mild, but some border on neo-Nazism, particularly when coupled with anti-migrant xenophobia.

Listed below are summaries of the rise of right wing parties in the European countries.  Most of these references are from Wikipedia.  They are a good starting point for further, more detailed research.


European Political parties



Right-wing populist political parties
Current right-wing populist parties or parties with right-wing populist factions

Some articles about the rise of the right in Europe.

This is incomplete and tilted left ala “Time Magazine” However it does have some good points.            http://time.com/4075396/far-right-politics-rise-europe/

Ariana’s “Huff” normally leans perceptibly left, but this article seems pretty well balanced.            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/europe-right-wing-refugees_us_562e9e64e4b06317990f1922

From UK’s left, another fairly well balanced article.


From India’s moderate “The Week”   http://theweek.com/articles/576490/rise-europes-far-right




A Country by Country Look

England

The UK Independence Party (UKIP /ˈjuːkɪp/) is a Eurosceptic and right-wing populist political party in the United Kingdom. Headquartered in Newton Abbot, Devon, its leader is Nigel Farage. UKIP has one Member of Parliament in the House of Commons, three representatives in the House of Lords, and twenty-two Members of the European Parliament, making it the largest UK party in the European Parliament. It has 497 councillors in UK local government and one member of the Northern Ireland Assembly.




France

The National Front (French: Front National, French pronunciation: ​[fʁɔ̃ na.sjɔ.nal], FN), is a socially conservative, nationalist political party in France. Its major policies include economic protectionism, a zero tolerance approach to law and order issues, and opposition to immigration. A eurosceptic party, the FN has opposed the European Union since its creation in 1993. Most political commentators place the FN on the right[13][14][15][16] to far right[19][20][21][22][dubiousdiscuss] but party representatives reject this and suggest other ways of looking at the left–right axis.[23] The party was founded in 1972 to unify a variety of French nationalist movements of the time. Jean-Marie Le Pen was the party's first leader and the undisputed centre of the party from its start until his resignation in 2011. Marine Le Pen, his daughter, was elected as the current leader. While the party struggled as a marginal force for its first ten years, since 1984 it has been the major force of French nationalism.[24]




Germany

Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West (German: Patriotische Europäer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes), abbreviated PEGIDA or Pegida, is a far-right movement,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] founded in Dresden in October 2014 that promotes anti-Islamic political positions.[11][12][13] The movement opposes what it considers the Islamisation[14] of the Western world and demands more restrictive immigration rules, particularly for Muslims who it views as refusing to integrate. Offshoots of Pegida have been formed in various countries. The movement has also opposed NATO and EU membership and has supported better relations with Russia.[citation needed]
The Alternative for Germany (German: Alternative für Deutschland, AfD) is a Eurosceptic[9][10][11][12] and right-wing populist[13][14][15] political party in Germany founded in 2013. The party won 4.7% of the votes in the 2013 federal election, narrowly missing the 5% electoral threshold to sit in the Bundestag. The party won 7.1% of the votes and 7 out of 96 German seats in the 2014 European election, and subsequently joined the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group. As of 2015 the AfD has gained representation in five German state parliaments. The party is currently led by Frauke Petry and Jörg Meuthen.’




Russia
United Russia (Russian: Еди́ная Росси́я; Yedinaya Rossiya) is the current ruling political party in Russia. It is the largest party in the Russian Federation, currently holding 238 (or 52.89%) of the 450 seats in the State Duma.  The party was founded in December 2001 through a merger of the Unity and Fatherland – All Russia parties. It supports the policies of the current presidential administration. The party's association with President and former Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who is a former party leader, has been the key to its success, and there is also evidence that the electorate credits the party (in addition to Putin) for improvements in the economy. Although the party's popularity has declined from its peak of 64.4% in the 2007 Duma elections to 49.32% in the 2011 elections, it remains by far the most popular party in the country, ahead of the Communist Party (at 19.19%). Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's current Prime Minister and former President, has been the leader of United Russia since 26 May 2012.  The party has no coherent ideology but embraces politicians and officials[7] with a variety of political views who support the administration.[8] It appeals mainly to non-ideological voters.[9] Therefore, United Russia is often classified as a "catch-all party" or a "party of power".[10][11] In 2009, the party proclaimed "Russian conservatism" as its official ideology.[2][3]
Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (/ˈpuːtɪn/; Russian: Влади́мир Влади́мирович Пу́тин; IPA: [vlɐˈdʲimʲɪr vlɐˈdʲimʲɪrəvʲɪtɕ ˈputʲɪn] (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Speaker_Icon.svg/13px-Speaker_Icon.svg.png listen), born 7 October 1952) has been the President of Russia since 7 May 2012, succeeding Dmitry Medvedev. Putin previously served as president from 2000 to 2008, and as Prime Minister of Russia from 1999 to 2000 and again from 2008 to 2012. During his last term as prime minister, he was also the chairman of United Russia, the ruling party.
The Russian National Socialist Party (Russian: Русская Национальная Социалистическая Партия) is a neo-Nazi party based in Russia. The group achieved international notoriety in 2007 when a video appeared on the internet purportedly showing members decapitating one immigrant and shooting another.
Pamyat (Russian: Память, Russian: Общество «Память», Russian pronunciation: [ˈpamʲɪtʲ]; English translation: Memory) identifies itself as the "People's National-patriotic Orthodox Christian movement." The group's stated focus is preserving Russian culture



Italy
Lega Nord (LN; literal translation: "North League"), whose complete name is Lega Nord per l'Indipendenza della Padania ("North League for the Independence of Padania"), is a regionalist political party in Italy.  Lega Nord was founded in 1991 as a federation of several regional parties of northern and central Italy  Lega Nord's founder and former long-standing leader is Umberto Bossi, who was minister for Federal Reform in Berlusconi IV Cabinet. In the most recent regional elections Lega Nord was the largest party in Veneto and Lombardy, the second-largest in Emilia-Romagna and Tuscany, the third-largest in Liguria, Marche and Umbria, the fourth-largest in Piedmont, and the fifth-largest in Friuli-Venezia Giulia and Trentino.

Poland
Law and Justice (Polish: About this sound Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (help·info)), abbreviated to PiS, is a right-wing[12][13][14] conservative[15][3] political party in Poland. With 235 seats in the Sejm and 61 in the Senate, it is currently the largest party in the Polish parliament.  The party was founded in 2001 by the Kaczyński twins, Lech and Jarosław.with the Christian democratic Centre Agreement forming the new party's core.[16] The party won the 2005 election, while Lech Kaczyński won the presidency. Jarosław served as Prime Minister, before calling elections in 2007, several leading members, including Lech Kaczyński, died in a plane crash in 2010.  The party programme is dominated by the Kaczyńskis' conservative and law and order agenda. The party is solidarist and mildly eurosceptic. Beata Maria Szydło (pronounced [bɛˈata ˈmarja ˈʂɨdwɔ]; née Kusińska [kuˈɕiɲska]; 15 April 1963) is a Polish politician who has been Prime Minister of Poland since her cabinet took office on 16 November 2015. She is vice-chairman of the Law and Justice party and led two successful campaigns in the presidential and parliamentary elections of 2015. She is Poland's third female prime minister and the first to succeed another woman (Ewa Kopacz) in office.


Spain

The socialist PSOE and the conservative Partido Popular (PP) have alternated in power for decades; and as the economic crisis has hammered Spain there has been no rapid emergence of a hard religious right-wing party.  Other noteworthy parties:
5,189,463 votes, 20.66% of the electorate
Republican Left of Catalonia (ERC)
Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya
599,289 votes, 2.39% of the electorate
Basque Country Unite (EHB)
Euskal Herria Bildu


218,467 votes, 0.87% of the electorate












Portugal

Since 1975, the party system has been dominated by the social democratic Socialist Party and the liberal-conservative Social Democratic Party.  The National Renovator Party (Portuguese: Partido Nacional Renovador, pronounced: [pɐɾˈtiðu nɐsiuˈnaɫ ʁɨnuvɐˈðoɾ], PNR) is a Portuguese nationalist political party. Its motto is "Nation and Labour" and one of its objectives is the promotion of a Portuguese nationalist spirit. It believes that nationalism is putting the interests of the nation above sectarian interests. In 2009, the PNR was the first Portuguese party to be called the "New National Right, Social and Popular".




Czech Republic

Workers' Party of Social Justice (Czech: Dělnická strana sociální spravedlnosti) is a Czech political party, often described as the major far-right extremist party in the Czech Republic. The party is not represented in any legislative body in the Czech Republic and its biggest electoral success so far has been a gain of 1,14% in the Czech legislative election in 2010. The party was banned, making it the first instance of banning a party for its ideology in the modern history of the Czech Republic.[8] The party was transformed into a "Party of Citizens of the Czech Republic"[9] and the party was renamed to Workers' Party of Social Justice.



Slovakia

The Slovak National Party (Slovak: Slovenská národná strana, SNS) is a political party in Slovakia. The party characterizes itself as a socialist, nationalist party based on the European Christian system of values.[5] However it is sometimes described as ultra-nationalist,[2][6][7][8][9][10] right-wing extremist,[2][11][12][13] and far-right,[14] due to its statements[15] about Hungarians and Romani which have been characterised as racist.[16][17][18] In the Slovak parliamentary election, 2012, SNS failed to meet the 5% electoral threshold, and thus lost parliamentary representation. On the following party congress in October 2012, the delegates chose lawyer Andrej Danko as the new chairman of the party.



Hungary

The Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance (Hungarian pronunciation: [ˈfidɛs]; in full, Hungarian: Fidesz – Magyar Polgári Szövetség) is a major national conservative[2][13] political party in Hungary. On a joint list with the Christian Democratic People's Party,[14] Fidesz won two historic supermajorities in the National Assembly in both the 2010 and 2014 elections (two by-elections, both in Veszprém county, have since eliminated the supermajority).[15][16] Fidesz is, by far, the most popular party in Hungary, with majorities in all county legislatures (19 of 19), almost all (20 of 23) urban counties and in the Budapest city council too, based on the 2014 local elections. It has been described as a big tent party.[17][18] Fidesz is a member of the European People's Party (EPP).
Viktor Orbán (Hungarian pronunciation: [ˈorbaːn ˈviktor] (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Speaker_Icon.svg/13px-Speaker_Icon.svg.png listen); born 31 May 1963) is a Hungarian jurist and politician who has been Prime Minister of Hungary since 2010 and the president of the national conservative ruling party Fidesz from 1993 to 2000 and since 2003. Previously he also served as Prime Minister from 1998 to 2002.
Jobbik, the Movement for a Better Hungary (Hungarian: Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom), commonly known as Jobbik (pronounced [ˈjobːik]), is a Hungarian radical nationalist[7][8] political party. The party describes itself as "a principled, conservative and radically patriotic Christian party", whose "fundamental purpose" is the protection of "Hungarian values and interests."[17] After the Hungarian parliamentary elections on 6 April 2014, the party polled 1,020,476 votes, securing 20.54% of the total, making them Hungary's third largest party in the National Assembly.



Sweden
Sweden Democrats or Swedish Democrats (Swedish: Sverigedemokraterna, SD) is a political party in Sweden that was founded in 1988.[20] The party describes itself as social conservative with a nationalist foundation,[1][2] though it has been characterized by some as far-right,[21] right-wing populist,[3][7] national-conservative,[22] and anti-immigration.[23] Since 2005, its party chairman has been Jimmie Åkesson, while Richard Jomshof has been party secretary since 2015 and Mattias Karlsson has been the parliamentary group leader since 2014. The Sweden Democrats polled 12.9% in the 2014 general election, and won 49 seats in the Riksdag, a 14% share.[17] Sweden Democrats, however, remains isolated in parliament because other parties are keeping to a policy of refusing cooperation with them


Norway

The Progress Party (Bokmål: Fremskrittspartiet, Nynorsk: Framstegspartiet, FrP) is a political party in Norway which identifies as classical liberal (libertarian) and conservative-liberal.[10][11] Academics broadly categorise the party as neoliberal right-wing populist.  In coalition with the Conservative Party, the party won the 2013 parliamentary election and entered into its first ever government.[20]
The Conservative Party (Norwegian: Høyre, H, literally "right") is a conservative[5][6] and liberal-conservative[6][7][8] political party in Norway. It is the major party of the Norwegian centre-right, and the leading party in the governing Solberg cabinet. The current party leader is the Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg. In national elections in September 2013, voters ended eight years of Labour Party rule. A coalition of the Conservative Party and the Progress Party (FrP) entered office based on promises of tax cuts, better services and stricter rules on immigration, with the support of the Liberal Party and Christian Democratic Party. After winning the elections, Solberg said her win was "a historic election victory for the right-wing electoral bloc"



Finland

The Finns Party,[1][2][10] previously known as the True Finns (Finnish: Perussuomalaiset, PS, is a populist and nationalist-oriented Finnish political party, founded in 1995 following the dissolution of the Finnish Rural Party. Timo Soini has been the leader of the party since 1997. In the 2011 parliamentary election, the party won 19.1% of votes,[14] becoming the third largest party in the Finnish Parliament.[15] In the 2015 election the party got 17.7% of the votes, making them the parliament's second largest party.[16] The party was in opposition for the first 20 years of its existence. In 2015 they joined the current government coalition. The party combines left-wing economic policies[17] with conservative social values, socio-cultural authoritarianism, and ethnic nationalism.[18] Several researchers have described the party as fiscally centre-left, socially conservative,[19] a "centre-based populist party" or the "most left-wing of the non-socialist parties", whereas other scholars have described them as radically right-wing populist.[18][note 2] The chairman of the party, Timo Soini has said that The Finns Party is Finland's largest workers' party but also stated that the party is definitely not on the left-wing. Inside the party there is also a movement which can be considered clearly rightist, led by MEP Jussi Halla-aho. The Finns Party has been compared by international media to the other Nordic populist parties and other similar nationalist and right-wing populist movements in Europe that share euroscepticism and are critical of globalism, whilst noting its strong support for the Finnish welfare state.[29][30]


Denmark

The Danish People's Party (DPP) (Danish: Dansk Folkeparti, DF) is a political party in Denmark which is generally described as right-wing populist by academics[4][18][19][20][21] and far-right by international media.[22][23][24][25][26] DF has also been described in academia and the media as a nativist[27][28] and anti-immigrant party.[29][30][31][32][33]The party was founded in 1995 by Pia Kjærsgaard, who led the party until 2012, when she passed the leadership on to Kristian Thulesen Dahl.  In 2014 the party won the European Parliament election as the largest party in Denmark with 26.6% of the vote; after the election it joined the European Conservatives and Reformists Group alongside parties such as the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom, Law and Justice of Poland and the Alternative for Germany. It received 21.1% of the vote in the Danish general election, 2015.









Netherlands

The Party for Freedom (Dutch: Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) is a right-wing populist[13] political party in the Netherlands. Founded in 2005 as the successor to Geert Wilders' one-man party in the House of Representatives, it won nine seats in the 2006 general election making it the fifth-largest party in parliament. In the 2010 general election it won 24 seats, making it the third-largest party. At that time the PVV agreed to support the minority government led by Prime Minister Mark Rutte without having ministers in the cabinet. However the PVV withdrew its support in April 2012 due to differences over budget cuts.[14] It came third in the 2014 European Parliament election, winning four out of 26 seats.[15][16]  Geert Wilders (Dutch pronunciation: [ˈɣeːrt ˈʋɪldərs], born 6 September 1963) is a Dutch politician and the founder and leader of the Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid – PVV), which is a political party in the Dutch parliament.[1][2] Wilders is the Parliamentary group leader of his party in the Dutch House of Representatives.



Belgium
Vlaams Belang (VB; Dutch for "Flemish Interest") is a right-wing populist[5] and Flemish nationalist political party in the Flemish Region and Brussels of Belgium.  Vlaams Belang originated from Vlaams Blok, which adopted its new name and changed some controversial parts of its statute after a trial in 2004 condemned the party for racism.[6] It has since sought to change its image from a radical to a more conservative party, and has distanced itself from some of its former programs.[3] Most other parties have continued the cordon sanitaire which was originally agreed on against the former party, effectively blocking the Vlaams Belang from any executive power, and attempts on cutting public subsidies specifically for the party were made through the Belgian draining law.

Luxembourg

The Alternative Democratic Reform Party (Luxembourgish: Alternativ Demokratesch Reformpartei, French: Parti réformiste d'alternative démocratique, German: Alternative Demokratische Reformpartei), abbreviated to ADR, is a conservative political party in Luxembourg. It has three seats in the sixty-seat Chamber of Deputies, making it the fifth-largest party.


Switzerland

The Swiss People's Party (German: Schweizerische Volkspartei, SVP; Romansh: Partida populara Svizra, PPS), also known as the Democratic Union of the Centre (French: Union démocratique du centre, UDC; Italian: Unione Democratica di Centro, UDC), is a National-conservative[11] and right-wing populist political party in Switzerland. Chaired by Toni Brunner with Christoph Blocher as Vice President, the party is the largest party in the Federal Assembly, with 65 members of the National Council[12] and 5 of the Council of States.


Greece
The Popular Association – Golden Dawn[9][10] (Greek: Λαϊκός Σύνδεσμος – Χρυσή Αυγή, Laïkós Sýndesmos – Chrysí Avgí), usually known simply as Golden Dawn (Greek: Χρυσή Αυγή, Chrysí Avgí pronounced [xriˈsi avˈʝi]), is a far-right[11] political party in Greece. It is led by Nikolaos Michaloliakos  Scholars and media have described it as neo-Nazi[3][12][13] and fascist,[14][15][4] though the group rejects these labels.[16

Austria
The Freedom Party of Austria[note 1] (German: Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, FPÖ) is a right-wing populist[12][13] political party in Austria. Ideologically, the party is a descendant of the pan-German and national-liberal camp, which dates back to the 1848 revolutions. The FPÖ itself was founded in 1956 as the successor to the short-lived Federation of Independents (VdU).
The party, led by Heinz-Christian Strache, sits in the Europe of Nations and Freedom group in the European Parliament.

Ukraine

The Svoboda All-Ukrainian Union (Ukrainian: Всеукраїнське об’єднання «Свобода», Vseukrayinske obyednannia "Svoboda"), translated as Freedom, is a Ukrainian nationalist political party.[2] The party won 6 seats in the late October 2014 Ukrainian parliamentary election ; losing 30 seats of the 37 seats (its first seats in the Ukrainian Parliament[9]) it had won in the 2012 parliamentary election.[nb 1][12][13] From 27 February 2014 till 12 November 2014 three members of the party held positions in Ukraine's government.[14]

Right Sector (Ukrainian: Правий сектор, Pravyi Sektor) is a far-right Ukrainian nationalist political party that originated in November 2013 as a paramilitary confederation at the Euromaidan protests in Kiev, where its street fighters fought against riot police.[7][8] The coalition became a political party on 22 March 2014, at which time it claimed to have perhaps 10,000 members.[9][10]

Ireland
Renua Ireland, commonly called Renua, is a political party in Ireland. The party was launched on 13 March 2015, with former Fine Gael TD Lucinda Creighton as founding leader.[3] Prior to its launch it had used the slogan Reboot Ireland.[3] The name Renua is intended to suggest both the English Renew and the Irish Ré Nua "New Era".[4]

Iceland

The Independence Party (Icelandic: Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn) is a right-wing political party in Iceland.[3][4] Liberal conservative[5] and Eurosceptic,[5][6][7] it is one of the two largest parties in the Althing, with nineteen seats, the other one being the Progressive Party. The chairman of the party is Bjarni Benediktsson and vice chairman is Ólöf Nordal.



Serbia
Far right in Serbia mostly focuses on national and religious factors and it refers to any manifestation of far-right politics in the Republic of Serbia.  The most well-known far right organization in Serbia is Nacionalni stroj (Национални строј, National Alignment). It is based in the Serbian region of Vojvodina, and has orchestrated several incidents since 2005. In late 2005, charges were pressed against 18 of the leading members in Novi Sad, and each of the suspects were facing up to eight years in prison.[1] This organization is now banned in Serbia.[2]
An organisation called Obraz, classified as Orthodox clero-fascist, was officially banned by the Constitutional Court of Serbia in 2012.[3]  After 2010., the new fascist movement Serbian action (Србска акција) is active.

Bulgaria
Attack (Bulgarian: Атака) is a Bulgarian nationalist[2][7] party, founded by Volen Siderov in 2005, who was at the time presenter of the homonymous TV Show "Attack" on SKAT TV. According to most scholars the party is extreme right,[2][6][8] according to others extreme left, or a synthesis of left- and right-wing.[9][10] The leadership of the party asserts that their party is "neither left nor right, but Bulgarian".[8] It advocates the re-nationalisation of privatised companies and seeks to prioritize spending on education, healthcare and welfare.[6] The party is considered ultranationalist[2][3][11] and racist, especially antisemitic and anti-Roma,[12] as well as xenophobic,[1][2][8][3] especially anti-Muslim[12] and anti-Turkish.[12] The party opposes the Bulgarian membership in NATO[1] and requires revision for what it calls the 'double standards' for the membership in the European Union.  In the Bulgarian parliamentary elections of 2005, 2009, and 2013 Attack was consistently the fourth-strongest party and won 21 respectively 23 of the 240 seats.

Romania

The Greater Romania Party (Romanian: Partidul România Mare, PRM) is a Romanian nationalist political party.[4] Founded in May 1991 by Eugen Barbu and Corneliu Vadim Tudor, it was led by the latter from that point until his death in September 2015.[5][6] The party is sometimes referred to in English as the Great Romania Party.


Croatia

The Croatian Party of Rights (Croatian: Hrvatska stranka prava, HSP) is an extra-parliamentary Croatian nationalist[1] conservative right-wing political party in Croatia. The "right(s)" in the party's name refer to the legal and moral reasons that justify the independence and autonomy of Croatia.[2] While the HSP has retained its old name,[clarification needed] today it is a right-wing party with an ethnocentric platform.


Bosnia Herzegovina

Croatian Party of Rights of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Croatian: Hrvatska stranka prava Bosne i Hercegovine, HSP BiH) is parliamentary party in Bosnia and Herzegovina and represents ideology of dr. Ante Starčević. Main goals of the HSP BiH are changes of Treaty of Dayton, abolition of entities and subdivision of Bosnia and Herzegovina into territorial units


Albania

The party of the Albanian National Front (Albanian: Partia Balli Kombëtar Shqiptar, PBK) is a nationalist political party in Albania and Kosovo.  The Balli Kombëtar was revived in Albania as a political party in the early 1990s . Founded under the leadership of Abas Ermenji, a surviving Ballist, who escaped from Albania when the communists declared victory in 1945.[1] In 1996 it won 5 percent of the popular vote and two seats in parliament.[1] It has since declined. In the 2001 elections it was part of the Union for Victory (Bashkimi për Fitoren) coalition which received 37.1% of the vote and 46 members of parliament.  The National Front has chapters in Kosovo, led by Sylejman Daka and in Macedonia, led by Vebi Xhemaili.


Macedonia
The Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity (Macedonian: Внатрешна македонска револуционерна организација – Демократска партија за македонско национално единство), simplified as VMRO-DPMNE, is one of the two major Macedonian parties, the other being the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM). The party has proclaimed itself as Christian democratic, but has been described as nationalist.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Under the leadership of Ljubčo Georgievski in its beginning, the party supported Macedonian independence from Socialist Yugoslavia.[13] The party has been leading a pro-European and pro-NATO policy in recent years, but it does not agree to the country's name changing. VMRO's support is based on ethnic Macedonians with some exceptions; it claims that "the party's goals and objectives express the tradition of the Macedonian people on whose political struggle and concepts it is based."[14][15] Nevertheless, it has formed a coalition with many ethnic minority parties.[16]

Montenegro
The Serb People's Party (Serbian: Српска народна странка/Srpska narodna stranka or SNS, СНС) was a political party in Montenegro.  The SNS was led by Andrija Mandić. At the last legislative elections in Montenegro, on September 10, 2006, The Serbian List led by the SNS won 12 out of 81 seats. It was then the largest political group in the Parliament of Montenegro right after the ruling Democratic Party of Socialists-Social Democratic Party coalition.   In January 2009, it merged with to People's Socialist Party of Montenegro (NSSCG) to form the New Serb Democracy.

Slovenia

The Slovenian National Party (Slovene: Slovenska Nacionalna Stranka, SNS) is an extreme nationalist[1] political party in Slovenia, led by Zmago Jelinčič Plemeniti. The party is renowned for its euroscepticism and opposes Slovenia's membership in NATO.[2][3] It also opposes what it considers historical revisionism of events in Slovenia during World War II and, to an extent, is sympathetic towards the former Yugoslav Communist regime of Josip Broz Tito.[4]

Kosovo

The Democratic League of Kosovo (Albanian: Lidhja Demokratike e Kosovës, LDK) is the second largest political party in Kosovo. It is a conservative[1] and liberal conservative party.






Turkey

The Nationalist Movement Party (alternatively translated as Nationalist Action Party; Turkish: Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi, MHP), is a Turkish far-right political party that adheres to Turkish nationalism and Euroscepticism. It was first formed by former colonel Alparslan Türkeş in 1969, who had previously become leader of the right-wing Republican Villagers Nation Party (CKMP) in 1965. The party mainly followed a neo-fascist and ultranationalist political agenda throughout the latter half of the 20th century, but later moderated its views under the leadership of Devlet Bahçeli, who took over after Türkeş's death in 1997. The party's youth wing is the Grey Wolves (Bozkurtlar) organisation, which is also known as the 'Idealist Hearths' (Ülkü Ocakları).[12] Türkeş, who is widely revered by Turkish nationalists as the founder of the idealist movement, is commonly referred to as 'Chieftain' (Başbuğ) by his supporters.


European Union
The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)[1] is a Eurosceptic[5][6][7][8][9] and anti-federalist[4][5][10] political group in the European Parliament. The ECR is the parliamentary group of the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists (AECR) European political party, but also includes MEPs from four other European parties and thirteen MEPs without European party affiliation.  The ECR was founded around the Movement for European Reform after the 2009 European elections at the behest of British Conservative Party leader David Cameron. During the Seventh European Parliament (2009–14), the ECR had 55 MEPs, making it the joint fourth-largest group. After the 2014 European elections, the party accepted thirteen new member parties, increasing group membership to 71 MEPs and making it the current third-largest group in the European Parliament.  The group is considered centre-right[11][12][13][14] to right-wing.[15][16][17][18] The largest parties in the group by number of MEPs are the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom and Law and Justice (PiS) of Poland.
Europe of Nations and Freedom (French: Europe des nations et des libertés, ENL) is a political group in the European Parliament launched on 15 June 2015. With 38 members, the group is the smallest in the European Parliament. The largest party of the group by number of MEPs is the National Front representing more than half of ENL's MEPs with 20 MEPs out of 38.  The ENF is the parlimamentary group of the Movement for a Europe of Nations and Freedom although PVV's MEPs are members of the European Alliance for Freedom and other MEPs are without any European affiliations.
Some Further links:






An Exposition on Fascism
Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism[1][2] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. Influenced by national syndicalism, fascism originated in Italy during World War I, in opposition to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism. Fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[3][4]
Fascists saw World War I as a revolution that brought massive changes in the nature of war, society, the state, and technology. The advent of total war and total mass mobilization of society had broken down the distinction between civilian and combatant. A "military citizenship" arose in which all citizens were involved with the military in some manner during the war.[5][6] The war had resulted in the rise of a powerful state capable of mobilizing millions of people to serve on the front lines and providing economic production and logistics to support them, as well as having unprecedented authority to intervene in the lives of citizens.[5][6]
Fasces
Etymology
The Italian term fascismo derives from fascio meaning a bundle of rods, ultimately from the Latin word fasces.[14] This was the name given to political organizations in Italy known as fasci, groups similar to guilds or syndicates and at first applied mainly to organisations on the political Left. In Milan in 1919, Mussolini founded the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, which, in 1921, became the Partito Nazionale Fascista (National Fascist Party). The Fascists came to associate the term with the ancient Roman fasces or fascio littorio[15]—a bundle of rods tied around an axe,[16] an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrate[17] carried by his lictors, which could be used for corporal and capital punishment at his command.[18][19]
The symbolism of the fasces suggested strength through unity: a single rod is easily broken, while the bundle is difficult to break.[20] Similar symbols were developed by different fascist movements: for example the Falange symbol is five arrows joined together by a yoke.[21]
Definitions
Main article: Definitions of fascism
Historians, political scientists, and other scholars have long debated the exact nature of fascism.[22] Each interpretation of fascism is distinct, leaving many definitions too wide or narrow.[23][24]
One common definition of the term focuses on three concepts: the fascist negations of anti-liberalism, anti-communism and anti-conservatism; nationalist authoritarian goals of creating a regulated economic structure to transform social relations within a modern, self-determined culture; and a political aesthetic of romantic symbolism, mass mobilization, a positive view of violence, and promotion of masculinity, youth and charismatic leadership.[25][26][27] According to many scholars, fascism — especially once in power — has historically attacked communism, conservatism and parliamentary liberalism, attracting support primarily from the far right.[28]
Roger Griffin describes fascism as "a genus of political ideology whose mythic core in its various permutations is a palingenetic form of populist ultranationalism".[29] Griffin describes the ideology as having three core components: "(i) the rebirth myth, (ii) populist ultra-nationalism and (iii) the myth of decadence".[30] Fascism is "a genuinely revolutionary, trans-class form of anti-liberal, and in the last analysis, anti-conservative nationalism" built on a complex range of theoretical and cultural influences. He distinguishes an inter-war period in which it manifested itself in elite-led but populist "armed party" politics opposing socialism and liberalism and promising radical politics to rescue the nation from decadence.[31]
Robert Paxton says that fascism is "a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."[32]
Umberto Eco,[33] Kevin Passmore,[34] John Weiss,[35] Ian Adams,[36] and Moyra Grant,[37] mention racism (including anti-semitism) as a characteristic of fascism; i.e. fascistic dictator Hitler idealized German society as a racially unified and hierarchically organized Volksgemeinschaft.
John Lukacs, Hungarian-American historian and Holocaust survivor, argues that there is no such thing as generic fascism. He claims that National Socialism and Communism are essentially manifestations of populism and that, for example, the differences between the political regimes of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy are greater than their similarities.


Ray Gruszecki
March, 2016

The Trump Phenomenon



The Trump Phenomenon

What a controversial character!  He’s a racist!  He’s a fascist!  He’s a Nazi!  He’s a buffoon!   He’s a clown!  He’s a game show host!   He’s xenophobic!  He’s Islamophobic!  He’s a demagogue!   He’s vulgar!   He’s an iconoclast!  And on and on and on.   One thing cannot be denied.  He is a phenomenon.  His alarming and disturbing rhetoric has fired up the country, pro and con.  He is media-savvy and a media star in his own right, and knows how to use the media to optimum advantage.

He is reminiscent of Teddy Roosevelt over 100 years ago, not only because he is another rich New Yorker, but also because he is so damned e-bully-iant.  Like Roosevelt, Trump’s bluster masks a more cerebral and pragmatic mien.  His scholastic and business background and accomplishments support this contention. 

He most likely is going to win the Republican nomination, and then he most likely is going to win the presidency.  Whereas he was once thought to be a passing fancy, he has become the dominant force in American politics.  From his past, and as he has repeated many times, he doesn’t undertake anything he cannot win or prevail at.  Being a successful businessman, he is using good business sense, pretty much funding his own campaign by loaning his campaign funds from his personal wealth, with a potential payout later. 

His appeal was once thought to be from the uneducated and disenfranchised.  Not true.  He has appealed across the board to people who are fed up with the Washington establishment, Democrat and Republican.  He has attracted large numbers of both intellectuals and blue collar workers, whites, blacks, and Latinos; and particularly he seems to have attracted much of that middle 30% swing vote that has become so important in recent presidential elections.  He has hit a mother lode of anti-establishment feeling – people from all backgrounds that are fed up and angry at what has happened to this country at the hands of the political establishment of both parties.  That there is more interest in the Trump salted republican primaries in 2016 than in past primaries is supported by this recent Pew poll

I’ve pulled together various commentary and references around the Trump phenomenon and list them below for further reference and study.  These are both pro and con Trump, and several give a British perspective on the issue.












Ray Gruszecki
March 11, 2016



Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Global Warming Review



Global Warming

One positive impact of the environmental movement is that we humans have become more responsible on what we spew into our air and water.  This responsibility is obviously a good thing, and even countries like China, India and Russia are become better citizens of the world concerning the environment by adopting some modicum of environmental controls.  Our atmosphere, rivers, lakes and oceans have become cleaner in the last 30 years.  Again, this is somewhat anecdotal, but the trend toward fewer pollutants has to be positive.

Unfortunately the issue of global warming has become politically polarized.  The environmental movement has over emphasized global warming, and has instilled fear in concerned scientists that have developed data and conclusions that counter the loudly proclaimed contention that global warming is caused primarily by human generated emissions into the atmosphere. A figure bandied about by pundits and politicians, including Obama and Kerry in the U.S., is that 97% of the world’s scientists agree that global warming caused my human emission into the atmosphere is a mounting threat.  This assertion has been proven to be patently false and based on spurious data.  These links support the “de-mythifying” of the 97% claim.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/  The following link presents what seems to be a balanced pro and con commentary of the global warming phenomenon.

A review of the data and conclusions of both the proponents and detractors of global warming (seemingly about equally in number, not 97% in either direction), is not definitive.  The studies are either incomplete, too anecdotal or political in nature, or the results and conclusions get lost in the scale and mass of the data.  These Pew Research studies add some significance.

The following link is to an in depth and comprehensive statistical analysis of the earth’s natural heating and cooling cycles and the effect of human activity on these cycles. http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/natural-cycle.  It appears to be a valid scientific attempt to examine and isolate the variables affecting the earth’s temperature cycles.  The scales used visually skew the results somewhat, but do not markedly detract from the conclusion, namely, that there is a measurable effect on the earth’s normal temperature cycles due to human activities since 1750.  This measureable effect is on the order fractions of a centigrade degree and almost gets lost in the scales used in the analyses.

The Open source Foundation, which has no political agenda reports as follows: “The data clearly indicates global warming is happening and is human caused. At this time in the natural cycle Earth should be slightly cooling on trend, leading into what would have been the next ice age. Instead Earth is warming. There is no valid evidence that can prove otherwise. False representations or facts out of context are not a proof of any kind, they are merely incorrect.”  http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths.  The OSS website presents a massive amount of data supporting the scientific basis for global warming, including very incisive animated clips that illustrate their points very well.  As mentioned above, OSS is apolitical.

So there is no doubt that the earth is warming during a cycle that it should be cooling, and that this warming is caused by human activity.  The question is remains – what type of human activity?

The above very comprehensive OSS study does not distinguish industrial activities from those resulting from the massive increase in human and animal populations since 1750, nor does it delineate the effect of deforestation on global warming.  Human beings have increased from 790 million to roughly 10 times that to nearly 8 Billion during this time.  http://www.geohive.com/earth/his_history1.aspx.  Estimates of animals that also breathe in oxygen, exhale carbon dioxide and produce methane through flatulence are estimated currently as 20 quintillion (20 billion billion).  http://animals.mom.me/number-animals-earth-3994.html.  If animals (farm animals, etc, have also increased by a factor of 10 since 1750 similar to humans, there should be a measureable effect on global temperatures by more humans and animals just being here on earth and breathing in and out with no burning of fossil fuels.

Quoting from the above link, “Forests are vital for life, home to millions of species, they protect soil from erosion, produce oxygen, store carbon dioxide, and help control climate. Forests are also vital for us to live as they provide us with food, shelter and medicines as well as many other useful things. They also purify the air we breathe and water that we need to survive. Deforestation by humans is causing all of these necessary functions to be lessened, and hence damaging the atmosphere even further.
Forests play a huge role in the carbon cycle on our planet. When forests are cut down, not only does carbon absorption cease, but also the carbon stored in the trees is released into the atmosphere as CO2 if the wood is burned or even if it is left to rot after the deforestation process.
Smaller crops e.g. plants and agricultural crops also draw in carbon dioxide and release oxygen, however forests store up to 100 times more carbon than agricultural fields of the same area.
Deforestation is an important factor in global climate change. Climate change is because of a build up of carbon dioxide in out atmosphere and if we carry on cutting down the main tool we have to diminish this CO2 build up, we can expect the climate of our planet to change dramatically over the next decades.
It is estimated that more than 1.5 billion tons of carbon dioxide are released to the atmosphere due to deforestation, mainly the cutting and burning of forests, every year.
Over 30 million acres of forests and woodlands are lost every year due to deforestation; causing a massive loss of income to poor people living in remote areas who depend on the forest to survive”.


To summarize, human activities have indeed contributed to measurable deviation in the normal temperature cycles of planet earth.  The extent and impact of this deviation has been exaggerated by alarmists pushing their own political agendas.  Efforts to reduce emissions and reduce our carbon footprint cannot fail to have an overall beneficial effect on our environment.  These efforts should be pragmatic and based on science rather than on anecdotal or emotional or politically driven appeals.

Ray Gruszecki
January, 2016

Sunday, January 17, 2016

A German Jew's View on Islam



A German Jew's View on Islam    
         
This is one of the best explanations of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanay, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.'

'My family lost everything.  I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

'We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.'

'The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.'

'The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China 's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.'

'The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

'History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, We often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims Have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our Enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.'

'Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.'

'Now Islamic prayers have been introduced in Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa, too, while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.'

'In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft have the halal emblem just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation's shores.'

'In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of "no-go" zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.'

'As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts - the fanatics who threaten our way of life.'

Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand.

Extend yourself a bit and send this on. Let us hope that thousands world-wide read this, think about it, and send it on before it's too late, and we are silenced because we were silent!!


 Life is just the blink of an eye - Eternity is Forever