Abortion, Roe v. Wade, and the Texas Heartbeat Law
Few topics are as emotionally charged in this
country as the topic of abortion, and the laws and practices around it. Charged
rhetoric, like “How can you be a catholic, (or any religion), and kill a baby?”,
“Abortion? The Supreme Court also legalized Slavery”, “Pro Life: The radical
idea that babies are people.” Or
alternately, “My body, my choice”, “Abortion is my Constitutional right!",
"Abortion is perfectly legal.", "You can't legislate
morality!"
Since the Supreme Court handed down its 1973
decisions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, states have constructed a lattice
work of abortion law, codifying, regulating and limiting whether, when and
under what circumstances a person may obtain an abortion.
This link is a state-by-state summary of abortion
laws in the U.S..
https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws#
The most recent controversy concerning abortion,
is that on September 1, 2021, the Texas Heartbeat bill went into effect,
banning abortions in Texas, as soon as cardiac activity is present in an unborn
child—around six weeks after gestation. The bill also allows private
citizens to sue and enforce the new law. Opponents of the bill appealed
to the Supreme Court for an emergency stay and the Court denied relief,
allowing the Texas law to go into effect.
This link is an analysis of the Texas Heartbeat
Bill:
https://texaslawchanges.com/analysis-of-the-texas-heartbeat-bill
The result has been an effective cessation of all
abortions in Texas, and howls of affirmation and opposition across the
country. “Right-to-lifers” are heralding
the Texas law as a major step in rescinding Roe v. Wade. Abortion advocates threaten to codify Roe v.
Wade into federal law.
This Axios article and embedded links cover responses
to the bill reasonably well.
https://www.axios.com/texas-abortion-ban-supreme-court-roberts-sotomayor-29e6b7ee-a947-4ef9-a790-35236b474b38.html.
This article discusses the impact of the Texas
Heartbeat Bill, and the upcoming SCOTUS Mississippi case, “Dobbs v. Jackson
Women’s Health Organization” on Roe v. Wade, and on abortion, in general, across
the country.
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2021/september-web-only/abortion-roe-v-wade-pro-life-heartbeat-bill-texas.html.
After an examination of the science involved, my
conclusion back in 2015, is that life begins with the zygote, immediately upon
fertilization, and abortion, however described, terminates or kills this
life. This is an extract from my 2015
paper.
“Science has defined that
life begins in that one second that it takes egg and sperm to unite to form a
zygote, a single cell that is the combination of egg and sperm. Life does not begin with syngamy, the first
division of the zygote, or at some more recognizable form of an embryo. Life begins with fertilization, the formation
of a zygote. A good scientific
explanation of the beginning of life is given in this link.
This being the case,
any attempt to stop or curtail life’s further development, through abortion or
other means is killing life. Is it ever
justified? Not in my opinion based on
scientific fact. The laws permit
abortion. Scientifically, abortion means
killing a human being. This is not a
right wing or right to life position. It
is a scientific fact. The decision
around abortion is an ethical and moral dilemma for every person forced to make
a choice whether to let life develop, or kill it.
A difficulty in the
debate around abortion is relating to life at a molecular/zygote level. If you can’t see it, how can it be life…?
Etc. And the rationalizations about the
size of the embryo, which trimester, etc. all belie the major issue here. Do you want to kill it or let it continue to
develop into a complete human being?”
Ray Gruszecki
September
8, 2021
Hey Ray thanks for the plug! I would just say though I'm conflicted by your conclusion. If life begins as a zygote, then what are we to make of the fact that zygotes at this stage can split (twins) and fuse?
ReplyDelete