Saturday, January 2, 2021

We Have Been Brainwashed!

 

We Have Been Brainwashed!

 The American public, though distracted by the increasing corona virus numbers across the country, is willing to accept the continuing propaganda that Joe Biden legally won the presidency with no fraud or illegalities.  This is in spite of a multitude of whistleblower witnesses and myriad smartphone video clips and a ton of other evidence to the contrary.  We have been brainwashed, folks.  By the biased print and broadcast media; by the algorithms in our social media; by our lying, unscrupulous, politicians.  Josef Goebbels’ Nazi’s, and the Soviet and Red Chinese propagandists could not have done any better.

 These forces, which started just being anti-Trump and hatred of Trump, are now are so obviously against free speech, a truly free press and against so much of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, that they have subverted the foundations of our republic.

 We know that there is unprincipled media, big tech and entertainment industry bias against Trump, against republicans and for the socialist principles of the democrats in this country that runs to rank hypocrisy. The Trump bashing of the past five years, and the fawning over Obama, and now Biden, is not only disgusting, it is tearing our country apart.

 This is nowhere more evident than when an anonymous “whistleblower” is protected, considered sacrosanct and used as a basis by a partisan “star chamber” House of Representatives procedure to impeach a sitting president over an innocuous phone call; and then when myriad whistleblowers submit open affidavits of fraud and chicanery in our elections, and are dismissed or ignored and called “conspiracy theorists” or “right wing kooks”, by the massed biased leftist forces. “Nothing to see here” says the mainstream media, as whistleblower after whistleblower comes forth with sworn testimony backed by signed affidavits, at risk to their lives and well-being.

 Where are the champions of the whistleblowers, who are risking life and limb, to tell the truth about our fraudulent and illegal election?

 The whole process, with the “fix” being in long before the election, is truly worthy of the most vile, egregious, totalitarian regimes that fix their elections to place their favored dictator in power, and revile or persecute those brave enough to object.

 The censorship and cover-up by the major media outlets of the news by the New York Post, one of the oldest and largest newspapers in the country, of Hunter Biden’s “pay for play” scandal, is a study of outright lying to the electorate.  Many voters said they would not have voted for Biden if they knew about the “Biden crime family’s” ties to China.  This is manipulation of the truth worthy of the most corrupt banana republics.

 Forgetting even the whistleblowers’ accounts relating such abuses as interstate transport and fraudulent processing of large volumes of ballots, any rational person just looking at the election results has to have serious questions about the validity of the election.  In fact, a majority of republicans and many honest democrats believe that something was wrong with the election.

 How could Biden, sitting in his basement for most of the campaign, garner 14-18 million more votes than Barrack Obama did in his two victorious years?  How many of these obviously excess votes came from dead people, double-counting, seeding ballots and tweaks of the voting hardware and software?

 How could the republicans have “flipped” upwards of 12 house seats, most of the contested state houses and legislatures, and lost the presidency?

 How could Trump’s massive support in the primary vote not get translated into an election win, as in all previous elections?

 How could Biden underperform Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia, and in those big cities in swing states run by Democrats?

 How could Trump have been leading by hundreds of thousands of votes at around midnight of election night, and lose in six primarily democratically run cities as ballots were dumped or computer results altered, through the night?

 Should there not be congressional hearings and perhaps a special prosecutor to investigate questions such as these and hear the testimony of the whistleblowers in an official setting?  If we can waste over two years and nearly $40 million on the Russian collusion farce, it seems that we should expend similar energies on whether our presidential election was rigged.

 But so far, the biased media have praised the election as “fair”.  The State and federal courts have demurred to hear the cases of fraud and illegalities presented by Trump’s legal teams.

 So, we have been brainwashed!  Unfair, unscrupulous and illegal leftist elements have “cooked the books”, and managed to steal an election, and there’s nothing we can do about it.  Mourn for our poor Republic.  Actions such as these by the leftists will surely kill it.

Ray Gruszecki
January 2, 2021

Newt Gingrich's article on the election

 Newt Gingrich's article on the election. Copied and ads cleaned up from the Washington Times.

Why I will not accept Joe Biden as president
Unwillingness to accept election result grows out of a level of outrage unlike anything previously experienced
By Newt Gingrich - - Monday, December 21, 2020
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
A smart friend of mine who is a moderate liberal asked why I was not recognizing Joe Biden’s victory.
The friend made the case that Mr. Biden had gotten more votes, and historically we recognize the person with the most votes. Normally, we accept the outcome of elections just as we accept the outcomes of sporting events.
So, my friend asked why was 2020 different?
Having spent more than four years watching the left #Resist President Donald Trump and focus entirely on undoing and undermining the 2016 election, it took me several days to understand the depth of my own feelings.
As I thought about it, I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes. My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs.
The challenge is that I — and other conservatives — are not disagreeing with the left within a commonly understood world. We live in alternative worlds.
The left’s world is mostly the established world of the forces who have been dominant for most of my life.
My world is the populist rebellion which believes we are being destroyed, our liberties are being cancelled and our religions are under assault. (Note the new Human Rights Campaign to decertify any religious school which does not accept secular sexual values — and that many Democrat governors have kept casinos open while closing churches though the COVID-19 pandemic.) We also believe other Democrat-led COVID-19 policies have enriched the wealthy while crushing middle class small business owners (some 160,000 restaurants may close).
In this context, let’s talk first about the recent past and the presidency.
In 2016, I supported an outsider candidate, who was rough around the edges and in the Andrew Jackson school of controversial assaults on the old order. When my candidate won, it was blamed on the Russians. We now know (four years later) Hillary Clinton’s own team financed the total lie that fueled this attack.
Members of the FBI twice engaged in criminal acts to help it along — once in avoiding prosecution of someone who had deleted 33,000 emails and had a subordinate use a hammer to physically destroy hard drives, and a second time by lying to FISA judges to destroy Gen. Michael Flynn and spy on then-candidate Donald Trump and his team. The national liberal media aided and abetted every step of the way. All this was purely an attempt to cripple the new president and lead to the appointment of a special counsel — who ultimately produced nothing.
Now, people in my world are told it is time to stop resisting and cooperate with the new president. But we remember that the Democrats wanted to cooperate with Mr. Trump so much that they began talking about his impeachment before he even took office. The Washington Post ran a story on Democrat impeachment plots the day of the inauguration.
In fact, nearly 70 Democratic lawmakers boycotted his inauguration. A massive left-wing demonstration was staged in Washington the day after, where Madonna announced she dreamed of blowing up the White House to widespread applause. These same forces want me to cooperate with their new president. I find myself adopting the Nancy Pelosi model of constant resistance. Nothing I have seen from Mr. Biden since the election offers me any hope that he will reach out to the more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump.
So, I am not reacting to the votes so much as to the whole election environment.
When Twitter and Facebook censored the oldest and fourth largest newspaper (founded by Alexander Hamilton) because it accurately reported news that could hurt Mr. Biden’s chances — where were The New York Times and The Washington Post?
The truth of the Hunter Biden story is now becoming impossible to avoid or conceal. The family of the Democrat nominee for president received at least $5 million from an entity controlled by our greatest adversary. It was a blatant payoff, and most Americans who voted for Mr. Biden never heard of it — or were told before the election it was Russian disinformation. Once they did hear of it, 17% said they would have switched their votes, according to a poll by the Media Research Center. That’s the entire election. The censorship worked exactly as intended.
Typically, newspapers and media outlets band together when press freedom is threatened by censorship. Where was the sanctimonious “democracy dies in darkness?” Tragically, The Washington Post is now part of the darkness.
But this is just a start. When Twitter censors four of five Rush Limbaugh tweets in one day, I fear for the country.
When these monolithic Internet giants censor the president of the United States, I fear for the country.
When I see elite billionaires like Mark Zuckerburg are able to spend $400 million to hire city governments to maximize turnout in specifically Democratic districts — without any regard to election spending laws or good governance standards — I fear for the country.
When I read that Apple has a firm rule of never irritating China — and I watch the NBA kowtow to Beijing, I fear for our country.
When I watch story after story about election fraud being spiked — without even the appearance of journalistic due diligence or curiosity — I know something is sick.
The election process itself was the final straw in creating the crisis of confidence which is accelerating and deepening for many millions of Americans.
Aside from a constant stream of allegations of outright fraud, there are some specific outrages — any one of which was likely enough to swing the entire election.
Officials in virtually every swing state broke their states’ own laws to send out millions of ballots or ballot applications to every registered voter. It was all clearly documented in the Texas lawsuit, which was declined by the U.S. Supreme Court based on Texas’ procedural standing — not the merits of the case. That’s the election.
In addition, it’s clear that virtually every swing state essentially suspended normal requirements for verifying absentee ballots. Rejection rates were an order of magnitude lower than in a normal year. In Georgia, rejection rates dropped from 6.5% in 2016 to 0.2% in 2020. In Pennsylvania, it went from 1% in 2016 to .003% in 2020. Nevada fell from 1.6% to .75%. There is no plausible explanation other than that they were counting a huge number of ballots — disproportionately for Mr. Biden — that normally would not have passed muster. That’s the election.
The entire elite liberal media lied about the timeline of the COVID-19 vaccine. They blamed President Trump for the global pandemic even as he did literally everything top scientists instructed. In multiple debates, the moderators outright stated that he was lying about the U.S. having a vaccine before the end of the year (note Vice President Mike Pence received it this week). If Americans had known the pandemic was almost over, that too was likely the difference in the election.
The unanimously never-Trump debate commission spiked the second debate at a critical time in order to hurt President Trump. If there had been one more debate like the final one, it likely would have been pivotal.
This is just the beginning. But any one of those things alone is enough for Trump supporters to think we have been robbed by a ruthless establishment — which is likely to only get more corrupt and aggressive if it gets away with these blatant acts.
For more than four years, the entire establishment mobilized against the elected president of the United States as though they were an immune system trying to kill a virus. Now, they are telling us we are undermining democracy.
You have more than 74 million voters who supported President Trump despite everything — and given the election mess, the number could easily be significantly higher. The truth is tens of millions of Americans are deeply alienated and angry.
If Mr. Biden governs from the left — and he will almost certainly be forced to — that number will grow rapidly, and we will win a massive election in 2022.
Given this environment, I have no interest in legitimizing the father of a son who Chinese Communist Party members boast about buying. Nor do I have any interest in pretending that the current result is legitimate or honorable. It is simply the final stroke of a four-year establishment-media power grab. It has been perpetrated by people who have broken the law, cheated the country of information, and smeared those of us who believe in America over China, history over revisionism, and the liberal ideal of free expression over cancel culture.
I write this in genuine sorrow, because I think we are headed toward a serious, bitter struggle in America. This extraordinary, coordinated four-year power grab threatens the fabric of our country and the freedom of every American.
• To read, hear and watch commentary by Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House, visit Gingrich360.com.

Corona Virus and American Federalism

 

Corona Virus and American Federalism

 

One of the criticisms of President Trump and his administration is that they did not act quickly and decisively enough to stop the spread of the corona virus in the U.S. in the early stages of the pandemic.  These critics say that the Trump administration used our American federalism as an excuse for lack of a cohesive national Covid-19 response plan.  Without referencing what our national, state and local federalism comprises, the leftist democrats used the lack of a dictatorial national corona virus plan against Trump in the election to blame him for the virus.  Obviously this one of many, democrat dirty tricks worked.  The gullible public went baa—aa, and ate it up.  In the meantime, the same unscrupulous democrats “cooked the books” just enough in the swing states, to elect “Basement Joe Biden”.

 But I digress.  This article from the New England Journal of Medicine is a well-researched, studious discussion of how our American federalism curtailed efforts to stop the early spread of the corona virus.  Since the article is from a medical perspective, it points to complete shut downs as an effective means of stopping the spread of the virus, and cites the uneven responses by American states and localities.  They inappropriately cite comparatively small and homogeneous South Korea and Taiwan as national examples of controlling the virus by shutting down.

 Still, the article is representative of a range of somewhat liberally oriented, medical opinion, which forms the basis for further political thought and action.

 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006740

 

Ray Gruszecki
January 2, 2021

Sunday, December 27, 2020

Baaa-aa!

 

Baaa-aa!

 President Donald Trump is an old “meanie”!  And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”!

 President Donald Trump’s tweets to the people are too raw and direct.   And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”!

 President Donald Trump is a “racist”!  And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”, ignoring his positive works for minorities.

 President Donald Trump is a “misogynist”!  And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”, ignoring his positive works for women.

 President Donald Trump is a “homophobic”!  And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”, ignoring his positive works for the LGBTQ+ community.

 And the biased media suppressed and covered up the Hunter Biden and Biden Family crime family scandals.  And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”!

 And Joe Biden did not stress the published, and readily available, socialist democrat platform, or his own accomplishments.  His message was “Trump killed people with his virus, and I’m not Trump”.  And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”! 

 And the gullible people listened to the biased propaganda on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and bleated – “baaa-aa”, and they elected Biden, after their crooked and unscrupulous minions first illegally “cooked” the rules in the big democrat swing state cities.  Signed and testified, whistleblower, eyewitness attempts to expose the fraud and illegality were met with the same derisive ovine bleats, and an uninterested judiciary.

 So, we will have Joe Biden as a figurehead president, really Obamas 3rd term, as evidenced by Biden’s platitudes, and his cabinet picks, trying to balance the extreme left socialist democrats with the more moderate middle in his own party, with a much weaker Pelosi-run house and an opposition senate (assuming republicans win the Georgia runoff).

 And the people that elected Biden, albeit illegally, will need to learn to bleat their acquiescence in Mandarin, since their buddies, the Biden crime family will ensure Chinese communist party hegemony in world affairs.  Maybe the sheeple will need to learn to bleat in Farsi, also, since the Ayatollahs will no doubt attain nuclear military capability under the “new world order” Biden administration.  Watch out also, for the little thugs, like Putin, Erdogan, Kim Jong-Un and Maduro, all of whom will no doubt ascend in stature under a demonstrably weak Biden foreign policy.

 Things will be just as bad domestically.  Trump removed many unnecessary restrictions, decreased taxes and let the economy grow to record proportions before having to shut it down due to the corona virus.  Trump also appealed to our patriotism and love of country, with all of its warts.  Biden will concentrate on the warts. To hell with the patriotism.  The Biden administration will stress political correctness,  identity politics, the cancel culture, the 1619 project in schools, and, the gullible people will hear the state propaganda media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT and WaPo, and will bleat. – “baaa-aa”!

 Until, hopefully, it all sinks in, - and the gullible sheeple wake up to reality, turn on their media herders, and re-establish some of the Lockeian and Burkeian principles that our founders believed to originally establish our country.

Ray Gruszecki
December 26, 2020

Saturday, December 26, 2020

“The Good Old Days”

 

“The Good Old Days”

 Just in case we begin to pine for simpler times and “the good old days”, I’ve extracted some commentary on life in nineteenth century America. After reading about diseases, sanitation and what horses contributed to society, maybe our fast-paced, seemingly narcissistic life and addiction to our electronic devices doesn’t seem quite so bad.

Nineteenth Century
Spreading Diseases

As American cities industrialized throughout the nineteenth century, infectious diseases emerged as a real threat. The introduction of new immigrants and the growth of large urban areas allowed previously localized diseases to spread quickly and infect larger populations. Towns grew into cities as industrialization sparked urban migration from rural communities in both the United States and Europe. The increased demand for cheap housing by urban migrants led to poorly built homes that inadequately provided for personal hygiene. Immigrant workers in the nineteenth century often lived in cramped tenement housing that regularly lacked basic amenities such as running water, ventilation, and toilets. These conditions were ideal for the spread of bacteria and infectious diseases. Without organized sanitation systems, bacteria easily passed from person to person through the water and sewage. As a result, many of America’s largest urban areas like New York, Boston, Philadelphia, and Washington DC fell prey to a rash of infectious diseases in the middle and end of the nineteenth century.

 

Understanding Diseases
Urban Disease and New York City

Large waves of immigration in the nineteenth century, made New York City America’s largest and most diverse city, but also its most unhealthy, as the large spike in population made it more susceptible to disease.16 Compared to other large urban areas, such as Boston or Philadelphia, New York’s death rate due to disease was considerably higher.17 It was not until the middle of the century that New Yorkers realized that their poor living conditions might be the cause of the city’s poor health. By the 1840s, high rates of disease were ascribed to the housing many of New York’s poverty-stricken immigrants lived in. Fear spread that while disease was rooted in the polluted living conditions of New York’s poorer communities, disease could easily spread to the more well-off citizens too. Public health officials realized that the city’s soiled streets and polluted sewers were a health risk to all New Yorkers.18 In the mid-nineteenth century, New York possessed a primitive sewage system. Poorly planned sewers spanned the city, but most citizens’ homes did not connect to these pipes. Instead, most New Yorkers relied on outdoor outhouses and privies. These outhouses were usually poorly maintained and covered in filth. Poorer families did not even have the luxury of an outhouse. They simply dug a small trench into the ground outside of their homes. Trenches and outhouses were both unsavory solutions as waste was rarely removed from them and frequently flowed into the streets of the city.

 Because of the high levels of unmanaged waste, epidemics of infectious diseases were commonplace in New York. The city battled outbreaks of smallpox, typhoid, malaria, yellow fever, cholera, and tuberculosis. In 1849, a rash of cholera struck the city, killing more than five thousand people. A wave of typhoid in the mid-1860s resulted in a similar amount of deaths.20 Port cities and transportation hubs, like New York, were especially prone to outbursts of infectious diseases because of the high volume of travelers that passed through the city. Cholera, for instance, was never a problem in New York until the overseas shipment of goods and persons between Asia and New York drastically increased in the mid-nineteenth century.

These epidemics were particularly deadly to children. In 1840, almost two percent of New York’s newborns failed to reach their first birthday. Especially in the summer months, infants and children were extremely susceptible to diarrheal diseases. These infections led to severe dehydration and, frequently, death. Young adults also faced many health risks. Between 1840 and 1870, nearly twenty-five percent of twenty-year-olds did not make it to the age of thirty. People in their twenties were often the most exposed to infectious diseases because of the long hours and dirty conditions they were expected to work in. The high death rate for children and young adults also had an impact on how nineteenth-century parents planned their families. Urban families realized that most likely at least one of their children would not reach the age of five. It was even more unlikely that parents would have most of their children survive their twenties to have children of their own. As a result, many working-class families adopted a sense of fatalism and planned on having large families so that at least some of their children would survive.

 This fatalist attitude was largely caused by the fact that Americans realized that they were contracting and dying from infectious diseases at an alarming rate, but weren’t entirely sure of why or how. The answers to these questions came later in the nineteenth century with the emergence of germ theory.


The Spread of Germ Theory

Towards the end of the nineteenth century, people sought to better understand and manage infectious diseases. A large part of this process was the widespread acceptance of germ theory.25 It was evident that poor living conditions—polluted water, overcrowding, spoiled food, etc.—were contributing to the spread of disease, but the science behind this could not be explained. It seemed that the only way to solve New York’s health problems was a massive investment in social programs for better housing and sewage systems, but also an expressed emphasis on personal hygiene. By stressing personal hygiene, however, responsibility for sickness was placed on the individual. This caused many people to blame the poor and infected for spreading their diseases.

It was not until the 1870s and 1880s that Americans began to realize that an individual was not entirely to blame for the spread of disease. As scientists analyzed transmission patterns of infectious diseases, they began to understand how specific pathogens were the causes of specific diseases. At first, many doctors doubted that something as small as a single bacterium could cause such deadly diseases. However, by the end of the nineteenth century, germ theory gained widespread acceptance in the medical community. The work of scientists such as Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch helped convince doctors and the public that the ideas proposed by germ theory were in fact true. Their work focused on testing the spawning of infections from bacteria, proving that specific pathogens were the causes of specific diseases. Convinced of the science behind germ theory, doctors and public health officials began testing water, food, and blood samples for traces of specific diseases. Using this data, government officials scrapped the old plan that emphasized simply ridding cities of waste and introduced a new strategy based on germ theory. Highlighting that diseases were often spread by individual contact, the new public health strategy focused on educating people on how they could prevent the transmission of diseases. These practices included recommendations as simple as frequent hand washing and ensuring that food was fully cooked before serving. The introduction of germ theory shifted the focus of public health and disease prevention away from citywide waste control towards an emphasis on personal contact and the individual spread of disease.


“Typhoid Mary”

The most infamous case of germ theory at work is the story of “Typhoid Mary.” Typhoid fever was a common problem in many nineteenth-century urban areas. A water- and food-borne bacteria, the disease spread easily and caused about a ten percent fatality rate. Typhoid typically struck hardest in cities without proper water sanitation systems, such as New York. However, by the end of the nineteenth century, when most American cities had built water treatment facilities, typhoid fever was still an issue and public health officials did not understand why. The answer was that many people remained typhoid carriers, without showing symptoms of the disease. Carriers showed no signs of illness themselves, but were host to the typhoid bacteria and could spread the disease to others.

 Mary Mallon, otherwise known as “Typhoid Mary,” is the most famous of these carriers. An Irish immigrant cook living in New York City, Mary was the first recorded carrier of typhoid fever. As a cook, Mary unknowingly spread the disease to many of the wealthy families she worked for across the city. In 1906, Mary began working in a summer rental home for a New York banker. Over the summer, typhoid fever struck over half of the people living in the home and the banker became worried that he would not be able to rent out the house again until he found the source of the disease. The banker hired George Soper to investigate the outbreak. ref]Evelynn Hammonds, “Infectious Diseases in the 19th-Century City” Soper determined that none of the food or water was contaminated so it must have been a cook who spread the disease. After tracing Mary’s work records back to 1900, Soper realized that Mary not only infected this family, but many others as well. Soper attempted to explain the situation to Mary, but she refused to believe him. In 1907, Soper turned over his findings to the New York City health department. The health department proceeded to apprehend Mary and quarantine her in a hospital. By this point, Mary was extremely untrusting of any health officials and frequently acted aggressively towards them. Tests performed on Mary confirmed the assumption that she was a carrier. For three years, Mary was forcibly held in health department custody. Mary was eventually released under the condition that she never cook again. However, she was recaptured shortly thereafter when another outbreak of typhoid was traced to her kitchen. Mary lived in forced isolation for the rest of her life, until her death in 1938.

 The story of “Typhoid Mary” has remained popular to this day, not because Mary Mallon was terribly unique as a carrier of typhoid fever, but because her tale epitomizes an entire era. Mallon was the first known healthy carrier of typhoid fever, but definitely not the last. At the beginning of the twentieth century, approximately one hundred New Yorkers became carriers of the disease each year. Mallon was neither the most deadly carrier nor the only carrier to disobey the health department’s guidelines. A man named Tony Labella is attributed to spreading typhoid fever to almost three times as many people as Mary and Alphonse Cotils, a bakery owner and typhoid carrier. “Typhoid Mary”, though, has found a prominent place in America’s history books because her story is the same story of thousands of others in the late nineteenth century. Mallon immigrated across the Atlantic to America’s largest city in search of a better life. What she found was a dirty and crowded city that offered work that came with low pay and long hours. Mary’s contraction and subsequent spread of typhoid fever is the perfect example of the cramped living quarters, poor working conditions, and poor hygiene that many late nineteenth-century immigrants faced.


What horses left behind in the 19th century city

Without the estimated 170,000 horses pulling street cars and delivery wagons at any given time in the late 1800s, the city would never have become an economic powerhouse.

But all those equines created a filthy mess. Each horse produced several pounds of manure and more than a quart of urine a day—much of it deposited on city streets and sidewalks.

 “Despite the presence of animals, the city had no systematic street-cleaning efforts,” wrote Columbia University professor David Rosner in an article called Portrait of an Unhealthy City: New York in the 1800s.

 “During winter, neighborhoods sometimes rose between two and six feet in height because of the accumulation of waste and snow.”

 “Dirt carters” would pick up the manure from the streets and haul it to specially designated “manure blocks,” where the waste attracted massive numbers of disease-transmitting flies.

Then there was the problem of working horses dropping dead in the street. “When a horse died, its carcass would be left to rot until it had disintegrated enough for someone to pick up the pieces,” wrote Rosner. “Children would play with dead horses lying in the street.”

 In 1880, the city picked up 15,000 abandoned horse carcasses off the streets. With that in mind, the noise and pollution from vehicular traffic doesn’t seem so bad.

[photo at right: the last horsecar run in the city, July 1917, on Bleecker Street at Mercer]


The 1918 Pandemic

The 1918 influenza pandemic was the most severe pandemic in recent history. It was caused by an H1N1 virus with genes of avian origin. Although there is not universal consensus regarding where the virus originated, it spread worldwide during 1918-1919. In the United States, it was first identified in military personnel in spring 1918. It is estimated that about 500 million people or one-third of the world’s population became infected with this virus. The number of deaths was estimated to be at least 50 million worldwide with about 675,000 occurring in the United States.

Mortality was high in people younger than 5 years old, 20-40 years old, and 65 years and older. The high mortality in healthy people, including those in the 20-40 year age group, was a unique feature of this pandemic. While the 1918 H1N1 virus has been synthesized and evaluated, the properties that made it so devastating are not well understood. With no vaccine to protect against influenza infection and no antibiotics to treat secondary bacterial infections that can be associated with influenza infections, control efforts worldwide were limited to non-pharmaceutical interventions such as isolation, quarantine, good personal hygiene, use of disinfectants, and limitations of public gatherings, which were applied unevenly.

 

So, think about it. Notwithstanding the politics, and the nonsense barraged at us daily, we can truly be grateful that we live in our modern 21st century. Even 100 years ago, the Spanish Flu Pandemic killed 50 million people world-wide and 675,000 in the U.S. No Trump ‘warp speed” vaccines or antibiotics or therapeutics then. People just died.

And 150 years ago, 15 years before Gottlieb Daimler invented the automobile, if we wanted to travel somewhere, we got our buggy whip, hitched the horse to a buggy, and off we would go through the smelly, horseshit covered streets.

So much for “the good old days”.

Ray Gruszecki
December 26, 2020

Thursday, December 24, 2020

Hillbilly Elegy

 

Hillbilly Elegy

 Through the years, there were a few New York Times columnists that I enjoyed reading.  Unfortunately, Tom Friedman, David Brooks and Ross Douthat have all joined the New York Times anti-Trump train into leftist bias.  There are still smatterings of objectivity in Brooks, and sometimes more so in Douthat, but all three of these writers have become indistinguishable from the left-wing media mob.  These guys are a far cry from truly enjoyable books like Friedman’s “The World is Flat”, and Brooks’ “Bobos in Paradise”, of years past.

 Ross Douthat here comments on Ron Howard’s movie “Hillbilly Elegy”, and the bad rap it is getting from movie critics.  I agree with Douthat that the movie will not win a bunch of awards, compared to J.D. Vance’s book of the same name, but it was not that bad, and some of the acting, particularly by Glen Close, was great.

 As I’ve commented before, J.D. Vance’s book was a sociological, in in depth look at opioid addiction and alcoholism in small town America, and how our society is affected.  Although the “Hillbilly” in the title pertains specifically to Northern Kentucky and Southern Ohio, I am originally from small town Massachusetts, and it equally applies there, as well as to thousands of small towns throughout America.  The movie is a more shallow, personal slice of the issue than  Vance’s book.

 https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2020/12/31/what-explains-the-movie-critics-loathing-of-hillbilly-elegy/#slide-1

Ray Gruszecki
December 24, 2020

Monday, December 21, 2020

The China Virus as a Weapon?

 

The China Virus as a Weapon?

 If I were a Machiavellian member of the ruling Chinese communist party, and I wanted to accelerate China’s economic and military capabilities to more rapidly gain on the United States and the European Union, what would be an efficacious approach?

 Oh, I know.  Let’s release a debilitating novel virus from our experimental laboratory at Wuhan, don’t tell the rest of the world, hunt down and kill off any of our population that contract it, and blame it on the Americans and Trump.  If they don’t believe that the American military did it, we can always say that it spread from a bat, and if that’s challenged, we can reluctantly admit that it was accidently released from the Wuhan facility by a careless worker.

 Since we can essentially kill off the virus spread within China, we can get on with our world expansion, - in the South China Sea, with our “Belt and Road Initiative” takeover of developing counties’ infrastructure, with our space efforts on the moon and Mars, - and in the cyber workings of our competitors.

 Too far out? Conspiracy theory?  It can’t be proven, but the CCP are not moral and ethical rulers.  They may be need to be market oriented to remain economically viable, but they are communists, and they follow Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin in their revolutionary aims to dominate the world. So, the cynical side of me does not put it beyond the realm of possibility that the Chinese communists weaponized the Civid-19 virus to take advantage of the resulting chaos in the rest of the world, to further their own ends and advance economically and militarily.

 President Trump saw the Chinese for what they are, our main competitors and antagonists. He balanced trade with China and stopped playing the economic “sucker” to the Chinese as previous administrations had done.  Of course, that will now be completely undone by the “Biden crime family’s” cozy relationship with China.  And unfortunately, as a result, China may very well, not only catch the West, but surpass us in economic and military strength, thanks to Biden and the Obama retreads.

Ray Gruszecki
December 21, 2020