Sunday, April 28, 2019

Gruszecki Surname, Peerage, List of Noble Families


Gruszecki Surname, Peerage, List of Noble Families



Having been born with a Polish surname like Gruszecki, it has been interesting through the years to hear American English speakers murder the pronunciation.  It’s groo-zek-eee in English, and groo-zshets-eee in Polish or Russian.  Since Polish was the first language that I heard from my mother, who was born there, the Slavic combined consonants that twist American English speakers’ tongues come somewhat naturally to me.



I’ve always looked the name up when I travelled in the past, but I could never find it in the phone books of any large cities like New York City, London, Paris, Rome or various other large western cities.  Until about the 1980’s when suddenly there were Gruszeckis all over this and other countries.  Someone, somewhere, “went and multiplied”.



I joined Ancestry.com several years back, and traced my paternal and maternal lines back as far as I could, which meant as far back as this country (Ellis Island, etc.), would allow.  The trail ended in Europe, at least as far as normal research was concerned.  There was no way without accessing records from Poland without going there, and even then, there were no guarantees, since Nazis and Russians had both occupied that part of Poland, and it was dubious as to what records still existed.



All of the above was several years ago.  A recent dive into Ancestry.com revealed that now, a raft of genealogical records were available in Poland in digital form, online, since the Roman Catholic church had made available their birth, marriage and death records going back for several centuries.  The Gruszecki surname has primarily Catholic, but also some Jewish roots.  I was able to trace the family lines in Poland back to the early 1800’s.



Another thing I recently found was that the Gruszecki name Is rooted in Polish peerage, and derives from the knight Maciej – Chorąży, or flag bearer, of the King of Poland Jogaila.   The King had given him the village Gruszka Duża, in eastern Poland, in favor of knightly merit, in 1411, presumably after the definitive battle of Grunwald, or Tannenberg, which defeated and drove back the Teutonic Knights.



The Gruszecki name appears in lists of both noble Polish and Russian families.  The Gruszecki coat of arms: 
















Ray Gruszecki

April 28, 2019

Measles in 2019?

Measles in 2019?

Measles? Malaria? Smallpox? Plague? These are diseases that were wiped off the face of the earth by advances in science and medicine and inoculation techniques developed in the 18th and 19th centuries.  And along came Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” in 1962, and the ensuing environmental hysteria, and lo and behold, DDT was banned and malaria was back.  Tens of millions died of malaria in Africa and South Asia.

In the 1950’s pseudo-science postulated a perceived and anecdotal link between MMR vaccination of 12-18 month-old toddlers, and the onset of autism.  Basically, “if autism happens when the child is vaccinated, the vaccine must have caused the autism”.  The popular press, fueled by the environmental movement, picked up and spread this idea, creating a marked resistance over the years to vaccinating children.  Hence, the return of measles as a public health concern, right now, in the NY/NJ area.

There are similar other deleterious ramifications of the environmental movement that are based on pseudo-science, rumors, falsehoods and politics, rather than on scientific or medical principles.  For example, addition of GMO’s to crops to increase yields to feed the world is a case in point of such a charged issue, as are politicized discussions around the human role in climate change.

Ray Gruszecki
April 26, 2019

Bernie


Bernie



I watched Bernie Sanders, the old snake oil salesman make his pitch last night for socialism in an hour long Fox News Town Hall in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.  As I’ve said before, this guy is no dummy.  He came out of Brooklyn to Vermont with his Marx, Alinsky, Russell and Debs firmly tucked away in his repertoire. He makes his pitch to the average person so appealing and sugar coated, that I was almost saying “where do I sign?”.


Forgetting the anti-Trump rhetoric, socialism always starts out with dissatisfaction of the status quo, and with idealistic promises for the future.  Everyone is entitled to “free stuff”, particularly those that are deemed to have been culturally denied in the past.  This includes free health care, free abortion, free education and a myriad of other free social services, including a guaranteed job and at least a $15/hr minimum wage.  Additional little fillips are “wealth taxes” on “the rich” and on successful corporations, reparations for minorities and forgiveness of college loan debt.


How are these all to be paid for?  Why, by increased taxation, of course, coupled with a redistribution of wealth from the capitalist “fat cats”.  In other words, socialism proposes to penalize the wealthy innovators to provide “free stuff” to everybody else, including those who are idlers in society.


Obviously this does not come naturally, so other means are necessary.  It is absolutely essential to take the guns away and disarm everyone.  Speech disagreeing with “politically correct” social justice mundanity must be curtailed and termed as fascist or “white supremist”.  Laws against emigration and movement by wealthy people and companies need to be enacted.  Stronger government and erosion/cancellation of individual and civil rights must lead the body politic toward totalitarianism and away from any remnants of democracy.  These drastic measures are necessary because taxation can only go so far.  Confiscation requires a strong, dictatorial government.  Socialism, communism and fascism require a commitment to the use of force.  You cannot decide what to do with the other guy’s money unless you are committed to use force to take that money from him. All socialist programs are mandatory and enforced by the government.  This is the reality of socialism — a pseudo-religion grounded in pseudo-science and enforced by political tyranny.


So it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see why socialism never works in the long term, and always leads to the Maduros, Stalins, Maos, Castros and other dictatorial butchers, and to the deaths of over 120 million of their own people in the 20th century.  Alternatively, socialism/communism morphs into market-oriented dictatorships like China, Vietnam and Laos.


 And yet socialism is no longer a parlor game for academics but a political alternative taken seriously by millennials and other thinkers, who don’t recognize that much of what they enjoy in life is a result of free market capitalism and would disappear if socialism were to be implemented.  We can maybe excuse some youngsters like AOC’s naiveté because of youth and inexperience.  How do we excuse people like Bernie, Markey, Krugman, Reich and others who should know better?


Ray Gruszecki

April 16, 2019

Why Leftist Hatred

Why Leftist Hatred

We Americans have always had political parties, to reflect our disagreements.  From Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists and Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic Republicans, through Henry Clay’s Whigs and Andrew Jackson’s Democrats, and on, to Lincoln’s Republicans and a continuation of the Jackson Democrats, finally nuanced by history to our current Republicans and Democrats.

Most times, and ideally, we were able to debate and settle our differences at the ballot box, and within the framework of our government, but not always.  In the mid nineteenth century, we had a debilitating war costing nearly a quarter million American lives over our differences.  Sometimes, as in the mid twentieth century, riots in the streets and burning cities related to civil rights and the Vietnam war punctuated our disagreements.

So, by those precedents, the current rift and rancor in our politics may seem mild by comparison. 

Well, it doesn’t feel mild.  One has to ask the question, why does the secular, “woke” left hate republicans and particularly conservatives and libertarians, with such an unreasoned, burning hatred, which is now exacerbated and magnified by that big target, Donald Trump?  This irrational hatred is not reciprocated by most of the opposing right, who certainly disagree with the other side on issues, but are normally willing to debate these issues in a rational and civilized fashion. The left will not debate.  They cling to their world-changing belief with a religious fervor.  They “unfriend” people.  They punctuate their radicalism by denying free speech at our universities, by violence in our streets and by continuing lies in the mainstream media.  Any efforts to counter their hardly camouflaged groupthink movement is termed by the shopworn epithet, “racist”.

It almost seems as if this continuing hatred of the right is rooted in an inability by the leftists to accept the results of the 2016 election.  They refuse to acknowledge that Trump won the election, and that in spite of his outsize personality and personal foibles, he is the true and bona-fide president of the United States.  He is not here because of “Russian collusion”.  He is not a Russian spy committing “treason”.  He is the republican President of the United States.  Since he or his campaign did nothing illegal during the 2016 election campaign, he was rightfully angry at the injustice of a special counsel investigating his activities.  His railing, cursing and tweeting against the investigation, while called “unpresidential” by some, reportedly did not constitute “obstruction of justice”.

A striking characteristic of the left is how mercurial and hypocritical they are.  A recent example of this is how they almost deified Robert Mueller while they thought that his investigation would find Trump guilty of all sorts of crimes, and how they quickly turned him into a villain when his report found Trump not guilty of any illegality.  Other examples relate to a dual system of justice for democrats and republicans.  Hillary Clinton obstructed justice in too many ways to count – permanently deleting emails, smashing Blackberries and hard drives, and on and on.  No charges were brought against her – yet.  Trump got pissed off at the Mueller investigation and Nadler wants to impeach him for it.

I’m willing to debate nearly all of the points of contention between democrats and republicans – socialism, healthcare, immigration, sanctuary cities, gender issues, metoo, “your truth”, guilt and innocence, etc.  I will not debate abortion, which kills more human beings than any other cause, and that’s a personal issue with me.

Other than debating differences, what gets me angry and sends me more toward Trump than I would normally be, are the blatant lies, hypocrisy and this duality of justice between right and left.  This is exacerbated by 90% of the mainstream media propagandizing on behalf of the left, and refusing to acknowledge when they have been so obviously wrong, as in the Mueller affair.

Ray Gruszecki
April 22, 2019

No Collusion, No Criminal Obstruction, No Further Indictments

No Collusion, No Criminal Obstruction, No Further Indictments

No Collusion, no criminal obstruction, no further indictments of anyone.  What a betrayal by the saintly Robert Mueller and his band of lawyerly democrats!

But Trump thought bad thoughts.  He said nasty things. He cursed and swore at the enemies massed against him.  He almost used his Article II powers to fire more than just Comey.

In this bizarre “1984” or “Fahrenheit 451” or “Animal Farm” or “Brave New World” scenario, this latter is not allowed, and the groupthink police as represented by the democrats like Nadler and Schiff, backed by Pelosi and Hoyer, will attempt to punish Trump and his minions based on the cultural principles of leftist group identity politics and “social justice”.  It’s not enough that Mueller wasted two years and 25 million dollars to prove nothing, the leftists in the House need to provide fodder for the mainstream media propaganda mills by spending additional time and money re-litigating the Mueller investigation. 

Americans, other than the inveterate and unshakable Trump haters, might say “enough already”, and continue to stray away from the leftist propaganda-laden CNN and MSNBC to Fox News, the only cable outlet that has told the truth about what has been happening with Trump, Mueller and the whole process, for the last two years.  Some might stay with CNN and MSNBC, for the sheer entertainment value of seeing eight to twelve talking heads bobbing up and down in agreement in their blind hatred of Trump, with not one word of dissenting argument allowed, unlike Fox with their Juan Williams, Jessica Tarlov, Marie Harf, Donna Brazile and many other dissenting leftist voices.

President Trump could hold the key to eternal world peace in one hand, and the cure for cancer and other major diseases in the other hand, and the democrats, or socialists, or what they call themselves today, would be convening a hearing on whether Trump helped Jared Kushner to get a security clearance.

The pure hatred of Trump by the leftists and their mainstream media cohorts is so great, that you simply cannot find an honest, balanced view of Trump and his doings anywhere but in a very few middle of the road or right-leaning media outlets.  Just turn on CNN or MSNBC any time of the day or night, for a propaganda-laden litany of anti-Trump rhetoric, with no opposing views.  Thank goodness for AP, Reuters, USA Today, WSJ, Fox News, National Review, because without these we would be completely inundated and indoctrinated by the preponderance of the leftist mainstream media. 

Why this unbalanced and irrational hatred that some call “Trump derangement syndrome”?  It would be easy to simplify and say “because he won the election”, or because he expresses conservative values.  But it’s more than that.  Trump flies in the face of the leftist cultural warriors and relishes it.  He does not give lip service to the leftist inspired erosion of inalienable rights and associated moral values.  He opposes the leftist attacks on our American way of life, and loudly exposes and fights the associated hypocrisy.  All to the cries and wails, and now the HR committee actions by the obstructionist left.

Not that Trump has always been some crusading angel.  It’s obvious to anyone who has been around a while, and has some street smarts, that he has cut whatever corners he could legally get away with to attain and retain his wealth. Its “water under the dam”, but the majority HR leftists would sure like to open all past indiscretions to embarrass him.  So far he has stayed one step ahead of them, in spite of harassment not endured by a president since Lincoln’s days.

Trump is a showman.  He is flamboyant.  He embellishes.  He lies.  He does not neatly fit into a political slot.  Leftists call him a “racist”, based on some of his campaign verbiage.  His actions belie that fact.  Although he has not been given credit, he has done much more for minorities than the “philosopher king”, Obama.  

In spite of overwhelming opposition, business and the stock market and the GDP are booming, employment is at record highs (including minorities), wages and take-home are higher, ISIS is defeated, NOKO is dormant, trade is being re-balanced to our benefit – and on and on.

Ray Gruszecki
March/April, 2019


Attacks on Fox News

Attacks on Fox News

This Washington Post article is an unbalanced and one-sided attack on Fox News, and is in keeping with the leftist editorial policy of this publication.   The New Yorker Magazine “investigation” referenced in the WaPo article is a similarly long and dreary harangue against Fox News and President Trump. 

If these two publications were rational, balanced news media, one might be more attendant to some of the points and claims made in these articles.  It is clear to any discerning consumer of the media, however, that both the Washington Post and the New Yorker Magazine are more “in the tank” of the socialist-democrat left, than they claim Fox News to be in the conservative and/or Trump camp.

I’ve never been fond of the term “fake news”, but it has to be evident even from mild exposure to most of the mainstream media, like the NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC ABC, CBS, NBC, that all of these are biased against republicans, conservatives and President Trump.  If it were not for Fox News, National Review, WSJ, and a few other media outlets, everyone in the country would be thoroughly brainwashed to the leftist socialist-democrat point of view.  As pointed out in these two anti-Fox and anti-Trump articles, why is viewership of Fox News so much greater than other channels?  Could it be that people are finding more truth and resonance at Fox?



Ray Gruszecki
March 20, 2019

Pre Mueller Report

Pre Mueller Report

I’m writing this before the full Mueller report is released to the public tomorrow, and I predict that it will be another big “nothingburger”.  Attorney General William Barr, who is not only the top law enforcement officer in the country, but also a former Attorney General and a lawyer’s lawyer with an impeccable credentials, has already given us the bottom lines.  No collusion.  No obstruction of justice rising to a criminal offense. No further indictments.

Leftist democrats like Nadler and Schiff will not be satisfied with the legally redacted report, and will strive to obtain the unredacted report and the million or so pages of background, so that they can continue what amounts to their harassment of Trump and the executive.  And surely there is derogatory material about Trump in the massive amount of material that Mueller and his band of largely democrat lawyers produced in two years for 25 million dollars.  There just are no crimes, so Messrs. Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi and the angry democrats are just whistling in the wind.

As has been proven so far in this farcical investigation, go to the mainstream media like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, NYT, WaPo Time, et al for continued entertainment on the “collusion delusion”.  Go to Fox News, WSJ, National Review for honest (but right oriented), news.  It certainly has been proven so far that these latter sources told the true story as the Mueller investigation unfolded.  The mainstream media forged a fiction and breathlessly reported it as news for two years.  Talk about rank hypocrisy!  And it’s been reflected by their drop in ratings when the public realized how badly they were being lied to and misled.

What should be way more interesting than beating the dead horse of collusion, obstruction, etc.  by the Trump campaign, are the IG report by Horowtiz, Bill Barr’s investigation of democrat spying on the Trump campaign, and Devan Nunez’ efforts to “investigate the investigators”, and to see how far up the democrat chain the conspiracy to prevent Trump’s election, and to depose him when elected, reached.  How about the misuse of the FISA process?  Did Obama know? Certainly, some of this material is in that million pages or so of backup material?


Ray Gruszecki
April 18, 2019

Culture Wars and Trump


Culture Wars and Trump



All of a sudden, it seems, we live in a world where same-sex marriage is federally sanctioned, use of marijuana is increasingly legal in many states, infanticide after birth is increasingly accepted, literally millions of illegal immigrants populate our country and numerous states and cities term themselves as “sanctuary places” in defiance of federal law.  In addition, the millennium old legal concepts of proving guilt with evidence, and “innocent until proven guilty”, have been up-ended by cries of we believe “your truth”, and not the proven truth.  Gender is no longer related to two sexes.  Gender is “trans”, and can be whatever you want it to be.



All of the above, and other “woke” concepts, like tearing down historical monuments, reparations to minorities for harms done hundreds of years ago, have been packaged together with that known historical killer of mankind, SOCIALISM, and are being proposed for our American future as a way of life and governance by our elitist leftist politicians and their mainstream media allies, which comprise upwards of 90% of news and entertainment media.  These things did not take 100 years to form.  All it took is eight years of the apologetic, permissive Obama administration to become reality.



Obviously, not all change has a deleterious effect on our society.  Legalization of loving same-sex relationships is a human issue that does not harm society.  Legalization of marijuana, warnings about it being an entry drug notwithstanding, really has little harmful impact on society.  Objections to these items are more based on representation of increased permissiveness within scope of cultural trends, rather than being harmful themselves.



When it comes to some of the other points, acceptance and compromise is pretty much impossible.  You can try to define abortion as a “woman’s right to her body”, “women’s reproductive health”, you can’t deny that it is the greatest killer of human beings in our society.  Guns? Wars? Disease and Pestilence? These pale in comparison to nearly 1 million human beings killed per year by abortion, and 46 million killed since 1970.



Do the above cultural, sociological and political values truly represent America?  Or are they the product of wealthy coastal and large urban leftist elitists, steeped in the permissive and corrupt culture of the “pay for play” so-called “progressive” universities that permeate our higher educational landscape?  Not if you ask most normal middle Americans, termed by the coastal elitists as “clinging to their guns and bibles” in that flyover country so much despised by the “woke” leftists.  Also, not if you ask thinkers and intelligentsia steeped in the classical liberalism of the founders of our country, and what are now some of the conservative concepts flowing from it.  



Say what you like about Trump’s ethics and morals and outsize personality and character, but he saw exactly what was happening to America and attacked it head on, with no mincing of words, and sometimes with brutish disregard of some of the finer points of behavior.  Small wonder that Trump is anathema to the strident leftists.  He is the antithesis of what they are about.  Trump can’t contain the slide of our culture to the weak and apologetic left as described above, but he can slow it down by fostering pride, rather than shame in our country.  For all his boss-like foibles, posturing, exaggerations, Trump and his administration are doing the right things on taxes, on lifting restrictive administrative regulations, on judges and much more.  The fact that a spoiled, rich, egotistical dilettante from NYC could become a populist champion is something to behold.  If nothing else, his rallies in the outback are as entertaining as anything else on cable TV.



Ray Gruszecki

April 21, 2019

A Tale of Two Different Somali Women


A Tale of Two Different Somali Women



Ayaan Hirsi Ali, born in 1969 in Mogadishu, Somalia, is a Somali-born Dutch-American activist, feminist, author, scholar and former politician. She received international attention as a critic of Islam and advocate for the rights and self-determination of Muslim women, actively opposing forced marriage, honor violence, child marriage and female genital mutilation. She has founded an organisation for the defense of women's rights, the AHA Foundation. She is a Fellow with the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, a Fellow with the Future of Diplomacy Project at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at The Harvard Kennedy School, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.  Her activism and writings about Muslim abuses of civil rights, and particularly, women have resulted in a contract on her head, or Fatwa, by Muslim authorities.



As a child, Hirsi Ali had to move with her family to Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, and Kenya, due to political turmoil in her own country and her father’s political background.  Ali was educated in Kenya at the Muslim Girls’ Secondary School where she was exposed to Islamic scholarship and religious life.  She was also exposed to Western culture and values in Kenya and began to lament what she saw as the rise of radicalized Islamic traditions imported from Saudi Arabia into East Africa. 



Hirsi Ali arrived in the Netherlands in 1992. Once there, she requested political asylum and obtained a residence permit. Between 1995 and 2001, Hirsi Ali worked as an independent Somali-Dutch interpreter and translator, frequently working with Somali women in asylum centers, hostels for abused women, and at the Dutch immigration and naturalization department.  As a result of her education and experiences, Hirsi Ali speaks six languages: English, Somali, Arabic, Swahili, Amharic, and Dutch. After gaining her degree and work at another Dutch think tank, Hirsi Ali In 2003, aged 33 won a seat in the Dutch parliamentary election.



During her tenure in Parliament, Hirsi Ali continued her criticisms of Islam and many of her statements provoked controversy. She said that by Western standards, Muhammad as represented in the Qu'ran would be considered a pedophile.  In a 2007 interview in the London Evening Standard, Hirsi Ali characterised Islam as "the new fascism": Just like Nazism started with Hitler's vision, the Islamic vision is a caliphate – a society ruled by Sharia law – in which women who have sex before marriage are stoned to death, homosexuals are beaten, and apostates like me are killed. Sharia law is as inimical to liberal democracy as Nazism ... Violence is inherent in Islam – it's a destructive, nihilistic cult of death. It legitimates murder.



In 2007, Hirsi Ali received her United States Permanent Resident Card (green card).  She became an American citizen in 2013.  She continues to write and speak for civil rights and against repressive Muslim regimes.  She is under heavy security in her public appearances, since there still is a contract out for her.





Ilhan Abdullahi Omar (born October 4, 1981) is a Somali-American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Minnesota's 5th congressional district since 2019. The district includes all of Minneapolis and some of its suburbs.

Born in 1981, in Mogadishu, Omar spent her early years in Baidoa, Somalia. She was the youngest of seven siblings, including Sahra Noor. Her father, Nur Omar Mohamed, an ethnic Somali, worked as a teacher trainer. Her mother, Fadhuma Abukar Haji Hussein, a Benadiri (a community of partial Yemeni descent), died when Omar was two years old.  She was thereafter raised by her father and grandfather. Her grandfather, Abukar, was the director of Somalia's National Marine Transport, with her uncles and aunts also working as civil servants and educators.   Escaping war in Somalia, she and her family fled the country and spent four years in a Dadaab refugee camp in Garissa County, Kenya near the Somali border.

Omar entered the United States in 1992. After first arriving in New York, her family settled in Arlington, Virginia. Her family sought asylum in the U.S. in 1995 and moved to Minneapolis. Omar's father worked initially as a taxi driver, later as a postal office worker.  He and Omar's grandfather emphasized during her upbringing the importance of democracy, and she accompanied her grandfather to caucus meetings at age 14, serving as his interpreter. Omar became a U.S. citizen in 2000 when she was 17 years old.



Omar attended Edison High School, and volunteered there as a student organizer.[19] She graduated from North Dakota State University with bachelor's degrees in political science and international studies in 2011. Omar was a Policy Fellow at the University of Minnesota's Humphrey School of Public Affairs.



While she was in the Minnesota legislature, Omar was critical of the Israeli government and opposed a law intended to restrict the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. She compared the movement to people who "engage[d] in boycotts" of apartheid in South Africa. During her House campaign she said she did not support the BDS movement, describing it as counterproductive to peace. After the election her position changed, as her campaign office told Muslim Girl that she supports the BDS movement despite "reservations on the effectiveness of the movement in accomplishing a lasting solution".  Omar has voiced support for a two-state solution to resolve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.  She criticized Israel's settlement building in the occupied Palestinian territories in the West Bank.  In 2018 Omar came under criticism for statements she made about Israel before she was in the Minnesota legislature. In a 2012 tweet she wrote, "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel."  The comment, particularly the notion that Israel had "hypnotized the world," was criticized as drawing on anti-Semitic tropes. The New York Times columnist Bari Weiss wrote that Omar's statement tied into a millennia-old "conspiracy theory of the Jew as the hypnotic conspirator". When asked in an interview how she would respond to American Jews who found the remark offensive, Omar replied, "I don't know how my comments would be offensive to Jewish Americans. My comments precisely are addressing what was happening during the Gaza War and I'm clearly speaking about the way the Israeli regime was conducting itself in that war."  After reading Weiss's commentary, Omar apologized for not "disavowing the anti-Semitic trope I unknowingly used".



On April 11, 2019, the front page of The New York Post carried an image of the World Trade Center burning following the 9/11 terrorist attacks and a quotation from a speech Omar gave the previous month.  The headline read, "Rep. Ilhan Omar: 9/11 was 'Some people did something'", and a caption underneath added, "Here's your something ... 2,977 people dead by terrorism."

The Post was quoting a speech Omar had given at a recent Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR) meeting.  On April 12, President Donald Trump retweeted an altered video which selectively edited Omar's remarks to remove context, showing her saying "Some people did something".  In context, Omar was expressing displeasure that Muslims were being treated as second-class American citizens: "CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us [Muslims in the U.S.] were starting to lose access to our civil liberties". In fact CAIR was founded in 1994, although it increased its advocacy activities after 9/11.  Some Democratic representatives condemned Trump's retweet, predicting that it would incite violence and hatred. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called on Trump to “take down his disrespectful and dangerous video” and asked the U.S. Capitol Police to increase its protection of Omar.  Others who criticized Omar for her comments included Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade, who said, "You have to wonder if she is an American first", and Donald Trump Jr., who tweeted, "This woman is a disgrace."





Ray Gruszecki

April 16, 2019

China, China, China


China, China, China





I first heard of the China Belt and Road Initiative when I was in Xi’an, China in 2015, where the old silk road started, and where this BRI is starting.  The following link looks at what China is doing in considerable detail.



This is China’s effort to achieve hegemony in much of the world over the next decade.  One quote – “Morgan Stanley has predicted China’s overall expenses over the life of the BRI could reach $1.2–1.3 trillion by 2027.”



China is bound and determined to be the predominant economic force in the world in this century.  Xi Jinping and the Chinese leaders are engineers, economists and businessmen.  They are not revolutionaries, nor are they thugs and oligarchs like the Russian leadership.  We really need to stop our unbalanced concern with Russia, who have a GDP the size of Texas, and concentrate on competing with China, who are truly the 800 pound economic gorilla in the world.



Trump’s trade and tariff discussions with China are aimed at rectifying the current trade advantages that China has had with the U.S.  One can only hope that results are substantive, rather than just sound bites for the media masses.








When I was in China a couple of  years ago, several things were readily apparent - people, people, people; and technology, technology, technology.  The great masses of people had great numbers of cell phones, tablets and other trappings of the digital age.  Technological advancement was readily apparent.  LED’s lit the cities and even the backwaters.  Internet and WiFi connectivity was ubiquitous, fast and controlled.  One needed a VPN to defeat the “golden wall” and access western services, but the hegemony of technology was evident everywhere.  And the people in the streets seemed happy and well adjusted, not dour and malcontent.  It was evident that their system worked for them, and they were quite content and happy with it.



I’ve commented several times that our true long term rival for world leadership is not Russia or the EU.  It is China, for many reasons, but primarily because they have such tremendous people potential coupled with an economy controlled by economists and engineers, and no longer by wild-eyed revolutionaries. What about Russia, many ask?  In terms of GDP, Russia is the size of Mexico and not growing very fast.  Mexico with nukes, but still the size of Mexico.  China’s GDP is $23 trillion, and is the largest in the world.  Ours is $19.5 trillion.



David Brooks discusses just how China “is an existential threat for the 21st century”.






This is the CIA World Factbook write-up on China’s economy.



China Economy - overview:

This entry briefly describes the type of economy, including the degree of market orientation, the level of economic development, the most important natural resources, and the unique areas of specialization. It also characterizes major economic events and policy changes in the most recent 12 months and may include a statement about one or two key future macroeconomic trends.



Since the late 1970s, China has moved from a closed, centrally planned system to a more market-oriented one that plays a major global role. China has implemented reforms in a gradualist fashion, resulting in efficiency gains that have contributed to a more than tenfold increase in GDP since 1978. Reforms began with the phaseout of collectivized agriculture, and expanded to include the gradual liberalization of prices, fiscal decentralization, increased autonomy for state enterprises, growth of the private sector, development of stock markets and a modern banking system, and opening to foreign trade and investment. China continues to pursue an industrial policy, state support of key sectors, and a restrictive investment regime. From 2013 to 2017, China had one of the fastest growing economies in the world, averaging slightly more than 7% real growth per year. Measured on a purchasing power parity (PPP) basis that adjusts for price differences, China in 2017 stood as the largest economy in the world, surpassing the US in 2014 for the first time in modern history. China became the world's largest exporter in 2010, and the largest trading nation in 2013. Still, China's per capita income is below the world average.



In July 2005 moved to an exchange rate system that references a basket of currencies. From mid-2005 to late 2008, the renminbi (RMB) appreciated more than 20% against the US dollar, but the exchange rate remained virtually pegged to the dollar from the onset of the global financial crisis until June 2010, when Beijing announced it would resume a gradual appreciation. From 2013 until early 2015, the renminbi held steady against the dollar, but it depreciated 13% from mid-2015 until end-2016 amid strong capital outflows; in 2017 the RMB resumed appreciating against the dollar – roughly 7% from end-of-2016 to end-of-2017. In 2015, the People’s Bank of China announced it would continue to carefully push for full convertibility of the renminbi, after the currency was accepted as part of the IMF’s special drawing rights basket. However, since late 2015 the Chinese Government has strengthened capital controls and oversight of overseas investments to better manage the exchange rate and maintain financial stability.



The Chinese Government faces numerous economic challenges including: (a) reducing its high domestic savings rate and correspondingly low domestic household consumption; (b) managing its high corporate debt burden to maintain financial stability; (c) controlling off-balance sheet local government debt used to finance infrastructure stimulus; (d) facilitating higher-wage job opportunities for the aspiring middle class, including rural migrants and college graduates, while maintaining competitiveness; (e) dampening speculative investment in the real estate sector without sharply slowing the economy; (f) reducing industrial overcapacity; and (g) raising productivity growth rates through the more efficient allocation of capital and state-support for innovation. Economic development has progressed further in coastal provinces than in the interior, and by 2016 more than 169.3 million migrant workers and their dependents had relocated to urban areas to find work. One consequence of China’s population control policy known as the "one-child policy" - which was relaxed in 2016 to permit all families to have two children - is that China is now one of the most rapidly aging countries in the world. Deterioration in the environment - notably air pollution, soil erosion, and the steady fall of the water table, especially in the North - is another long-term problem. China continues to lose arable land because of erosion and urbanization. The Chinese Government is seeking to add energy production capacity from sources other than coal and oil, focusing on natural gas, nuclear, and clean energy development. In 2016, China ratified the Paris Agreement, a multilateral agreement to combat climate change, and committed to peak its carbon dioxide emissions between 2025 and 2030.



The government's 13th Five-Year Plan, unveiled in March 2016, emphasizes the need to increase innovation and boost domestic consumption to make the economy less dependent on government investment, exports, and heavy industry. However, China has made more progress on subsidizing innovation than rebalancing the economy. Beijing has committed to giving the market a more decisive role in allocating resources, but the Chinese Government’s policies continue to favor state-owned enterprises and emphasize stability. Chinese leaders in 2010 pledged to double China’s GDP by 2020, and the 13th Five Year Plan includes annual economic growth targets of at least 6.5% through 2020 to achieve that goal. In recent years, China has renewed its support for state-owned enterprises in sectors considered important to "economic security," explicitly looking to foster globally competitive industries. Chinese leaders also have undermined some market-oriented reforms by reaffirming the "dominant" role of the state in the economy, a stance that threatens to discourage private initiative and make the economy less efficient over time. The slight acceleration in economic growth in 2017—the first such uptick since 2010—gives Beijing more latitude to pursue its economic reforms, focusing on financial sector deleveraging and its Supply-Side Structural Reform agenda, first announced in late 2015.





Ray Gruszecki

March/April, 2019

Trump and Racism Revisited


Trump and Racism Revisited





Our coastal leftist democrats and the 90% + anti-Trump mainstream media has painted Trump as a virulent racist.  Drawing on this, Bernie Sanders has called Trump a racist to partisan crowds, and Joe Biden’s participation announcement called Trump a racist based on his comment after Charlottesville that there “were fine people on both sides”, which was taken completely out of context and implied that Trump was referring to white supremacists as “fine people”.  In actual fact, the “fine people” comment pertained to innocent, non-violent protesters, (who had permits), to removing General Robert E. Lee’s statue from the Charlottesville park.  Trump soundly condemned the torch-carrying white supremacists and neo Nazis, as well as the black-shirted and masked antifa thugs with baseball bats that fought with the alt-right group.  He expressed sympathy for the peaceful demonstrators that were there to protest the degradation of a famous American general.



Admittedly, Trump’s rhetoric sometimes gets carried away to the point that he expresses what a lot of Americans think, but which is anathema to politically correct leftists, and their MSM accomplices.  Talk is cheap, someone once said, and the term “racist” is so overused by the “woke” leftists, that it has become almost meaningless.  Disagree with the groupthink left about virtually anything, and immediately be termed a “racist”.



Many feel that Trump should keep his mouth shut and his thumbs off the tweeter, particularly when it comes to ethnic comments which are as natural as The Bronx on an Eastern construction site, but not so cool in this intersectional, “woke” political environment.  Inappropriate rhetoric and tweets notwithstanding, Trump is not at all “racist” when it comes to action, rather than words, for minorities.  Trump has always stressed the equality of “all Americans”, with no unusual special privileges for identity groups.  This is what puts him at odds with socialist elitists in the coastal and major urban centers and the mainstream media that back them, whose “cause celebre” is special treatment, reparations and glorifying of identity groups.  The link refers to action that Trump has taken concerning minorities, rather than his sometimes provocative rhetoric, and the equally provocative rantings of the left.








Ray Gruszecki

April 26, 2019


Links to the Mueller Report and Excerpts


Links to the Mueller Report and Excerpts







Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index




Excerpts and Analysis From the Mueller Report - NYT




Key Excerpts From the Mueller Report - WSJ











Ray Gruszecki

April 21, 2019


Friday, April 12, 2019

Trump, Why and Wherefore?


Trump, Why and Wherefore?



I have never been a big fan of Donald Trump, the man.  In fact when I lived and worked in the New York City area, seeing “Trump” all over the city skyline somewhat turned me off.  I never followed his celebrity marriages and sexual encounters and TV reality shows.  I really could care less about all of that publicity and ostentation and braggadocio.



Being mostly republican and definitely against the corrupt Clinton machine, left little choice but to vote for Trump.  After all, we were not electing him because he is such a nice guy or for his personality, we were electing him to fix the country by halting or slowing the economic and cultural decline resulting from eight years of Obama’s apologist, identity based, socialist governance.



Trump’s campaign for president was entertaining, to say the least.  He did not elicit high blown philosophical and political principles.  He espoused business principles. He also belittled and called his opponents catch-phrase names, like a grammar school bully.  And all the forgotten deplorables holding onto their guns and bibles in flyover country and the rust belt, as well as a good deal of the rest of American voters, found his antics refreshing and elected him president.



Then the question became whether to support Trump’s rather rude and crude way of governing, or oppose him.  Some good republicans opposed him, I guess based on his personality and his questionable and halting first months in office.  The democrat leftists, supported by 90% of the mainstream media in the country absolutely vilified him and threatened to impeach him for a variety of implied transgressions.



The reason that many like myself continued to support him was because of his results in face of the absolutely unfair and one-sided leftist machine arrayed against him.  These anti-Trump leftists tolerated absolutely no opposition or debate.  Their groupthink and groupspeak was the only way.  Anything else was “racist” or “white supremist”.  Their rioting in the streets and destruction were termed first amendment dissension and opposition.  Any demonstrations from the right were illegal and “racist”.  The continuing, unmitigated hypocrisy of the democrat leftists and their MSM allies is appalling and pervades all aspects of our society.  Anyone interested in common decency and fairness cannot fail to see the abuses.



For all of his bluster and BS and sometimes outright lies, the economy is roaring, (not because of Obama – because Trump lowered taxes and did away with stifling regulations), unemployment is at record lows, ISIS is defeated, North Korea is relatively quiet, inequitable trade is being redressed and immigration is at least in the forefront of our thinking even if the democrats (and some RINO’s), refuse to participate in a solution.  All this in spite of all the head winds of MSM opposition, the Mueller investigation and cries of impeachment.  (What are they going to impeach him for? For any of the above?  I don’t think so).



So I still think of Trump, “on jest takim dupkiem”, which my Polish mother used to say.  But look at the alternatives in the coming 2020 election.  Old Joe? Been there, done that, but at least somewhat normal and human.  Bernie? Old firebrand communist, who took it to the streets a long time ago, and can still fire up the gullible kids with “free stuff”. Elizabeth Warren?  Trump “dearrowed” her a while back, but she’s “persistent”.  Pretty much the rest of the leftist candidates?  All trying to outdo each other on how far socialist/communist left they can go, supporting weird things like the green new deal, wealth confiscation, gun confiscation, reparations to myriad past minorities and on and on, with methods used by past socialist/communist/totalitarian regimes to pacify their people for future plunder, all steeped with the rubrics of “political correctness”, “social justice”, the #metoo movement and other cultural innovations.  No its Trump in 2020, unless he completely goes off the rails, again not because he’s a nice guy, but because he needs to continue cleaning house and streamlining the country now that he is free from the Mueller investigation.





Ray Gruszecki

April 12, 2019

Sunday, April 7, 2019

Echoes of the Past


Echoes of the Past



I write this not to beat my own drum, but to illustrate how much the world has changed over the generations.  Whereas my generation started working and got married and had kids quite early in life, many modern young people are still living with their parents into their 30’s.  One can blame the con game perpetrated on modern young people by the student loan fiasco, and myriad other sociological causes, but the fact remains, in many cases, people don’t start living productive lives until quite a bit later in life than we did.



It is so obviously a different world than the one that I grew up in.  My first earning job was cutting grass and landscaping at age 12, followed by mucking out dairy stanchions and helping bale hay at age 13.  At age 14, I was “picking rocks” and driving a tractor to plow and harrow potato growing fields.  At age 16, I had a driver’s license and was working a full 2-10 pm shift for $1.09/hour in the “Berkshire Mills” in Adams, MA, while pursuing the Scientific course in high school, with grades near the top of my class.



The “Berkshire” here lent that name to Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Corporation. It was a traditional New England cotton mill, converting southern cotton into cloth.  Workers comprised a mixture of locals and in 1952, some displaced persons from the European wars.  I learned to work with and interface with adult men in the real workforce at an early age.  I also picked up some habits like drinking and smoking early on.  While my $1.09/hour was fine for my young needs, I could see that guys were supporting their whole families for not much more.  I could directly see the value of education in my future, particularly since my grades were decent.



Cajoled by my mother and high school principal, I went to Northeastern University in Boston and majored in Chemical Engineering.  I pretty much worked my way through college with help from a few academic scholarships, and some minimal, but emergency help from my family.  My class (’59) at Northeastern consisted of about half 18 year-old kids just out of high school, like myself, and half Korean war veterans in their 20’s, many of whom were married and raising families.  Of course, I associated mostly with the latter, since I had already been in the workforce, and not with “the kids”.  In truth, I fit in with both groups reasonably well.



I wish I could say that engineering school was a “snap”, and that I graduated at the top of my class.  In truth, it was hard, working and going to school.  Northeastern is a co-op school, so that helped, but sometimes the co-op assignments did not pay very well, and I would do construction work instead, with better pay. Overall, my engineering grades were decent, but I devoted insufficient time to pull top grades in some of the other classes.  I think my education in the humanities really started by living life well after college.



I married, and fulfilled my 6-month active duty military responsibility immediately after graduating from Northeastern.  We had a son, to add to my wife’s son from a previous marriage.  I joined an international oil company, and we moved to the New York City area during that first year after graduating.  We moved to Holland within a year, and soon after that had a daughter.



I relate all of this, because at age 25, I was married with 3 children, living in Europe and working professionally at an oil refinery in Holland.  We had a house, a live-in maid, new car, a decent salary and a great future.  And this was not only me.  My contemporaries, both American and European, were similar – professional, productive, in our 20’s, raising families.  A definite part of productive society.



Can you see the difference?  Many modern kids, in their 20’s, living with their parents, owing upwards of $200k in student loans, unable to earn very well with that degree in English or History or Social Justice or Political Correctness that they paid $50k a year for.  They will not be out from under until well into their 30’s.



Again, this not to glorify the past contrasted to our modern times.  There are many young people in our day and age who start in life early and attain success at an early age, with and without college.  One of the watchwords of our society is that we want to send all of our kids to college, thinking that it will guarantee some degree of success in life.  It seems that a poor choice of course of study in college doesn’t guarantee much more that a large student loan bill, and small chance of a decent paying job.  Many times, a technical school or trade school, while not as prestigious as some colleges, offers more insofar as a career path is concerned.



Ray Gruszecki

April 7, 2019