Trump Could Not Possibly Win the
Presidency in 2016
I have been visiting in primarily rural areas of
Massachusetts, New York State and Vermont, where the normal, average Americans
who mostly voted for Trump live.
They live in liberal Eastern states in which the large
population centers are democrat and anti-Trump, and which always swing these
states to the liberal side of politics.
But the rural areas of these states are mainly conservative, and while
not overwhelmingly pro-Trump, they are not part of the never-Trump “resistance”
or obstructionism. Hopefully these areas
will elect republican members of the House of Representatives, even if the
state most likely will not elect republican senators. To be noted, however, is
the fact that the current governor of Massachusetts is Charlie Baker, is a
republican, and the governor of Vermont is Phil Scott, also a republican. Senators from these states are notorious
left-wingers, Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts, and Bernie Sanders from
Vermont
All of the government, media, intelligentsia and the Acela
and West Coast elites were against him.
The polls were against him. He
was laughed at in the media. And he came
out, called them all names like a vulgarian, insulted heroic icons, voiced the
most outrageous proposals, and prevailed, filling halls with 20-30,000 people
at his rallies. Years of rough and
tumble in NYC real estate, on reality shows and in public life prepared him to
“sell” his brand to 50% of the American electorate as their champion. Many, but not all, were disenfranchised blue
collar Americans in the rust belt. His
appeal to “make America great again” resonated all across the vast expanse of
the country, and even into the preserves of liberal America.
But he could not possibly win the election. The whole country was massed against him. The
popular, “philosopher king” president and his minions, and virtually the whole
Washington political establishment were against him. Virtually all major
newspapers were against him. All major TV
media other than Fox were against him.
Virtually all so called intelligentsia were against him. Pretty much 100% of university thinking was
against him. All the special interest
minority and lifestyle groups were against him.
The above societal elements radicalized women, blacks and Latinos and
other “identity political” groups against him.
How could he possibly win the election?
And yet he won the electoral vote and the popular vote in 49
states.
After
19 months in office, the vituperativeness
directed at him by the mainstream media, Hollywood and much of academia is
beyond belief, and way beyond what any sitting president in recent memory has
had to endure.
Why would a 70 year old billionaire with a beautiful wife
and family, owning domiciles, real estate and golf courses all over the world,
with his own planes, helicopters and yachts choose to be denounced and reviled
as a clown and a joke? Why would he take
on the rigors of a grueling campaign schedule against the real professional
politicians who had such massive forces aligned against him? Was it for money, power, prestige? He had all these, in spades. The only explanation was that this rich,
shallow NYC playboy wasn’t so shallow and was a true American patriot. He saw the weakened and pathetic state of our
country and populace and decided to do something about it.
And he did. He rode
the populist wave to the presidency.
I have to believe him when he says that he did this for the
good of the country. Why else? He certainly has all the wealth and power
he’ll ever need. The White House and Air
Force One are a step down for him when it comes to creature comforts. Why endure a year and a half of a grueling
political campaign to then take on the toughest job in the world? He says it’s to make America great
again. I have to believe him.
Ray Gruszecki
Sept 2, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment