Friday, June 24, 2022

Overturning Federal Abortion

 

Overturning Federal Abortion

 This is a “no BS” reference to today’s Dobbs v. Jackson SCOTUS overturning of  Roe V. Wade and Planned Parenthood v, Casey.  There is a quote from Dobbs, and links to the full text of Dobbs v. Jackson, Roe v. Wade and PP v. Casey.  All references are direct, with no contamination by opinions from talking heads of differing political views.

 From Dobbs v. Jackson, overturning Roe and Casey – Delivered by Justice Alito:

 “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.

 The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

 That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U. S. 702, 721 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). The right to abortion does not fall within this category.

 Until the latter part of the 20th century, such a right was entirely unknown in American law. Indeed, when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted, three quarters of the States made abortion a crime at all stages of pregnancy. The abortion right is also critically different from any other right that this Court has held to fall within the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of “liberty.”

 Roe’s defenders characterize the abortion right as similar to the rights recognized in past decisions involving matters such as intimate sexual relations, contraception, and marriage, but abortion is fundamentally different, as both Roe and Casey acknowledged, because it destroys what those decisions called “fetal life” and what the law now before us describes as an “unborn human being.”

 13 Stare decisis, the doctrine on which Casey’s controlling —————— 13Miss. Code Ann. §41–41–191(4)(b) (2018). 6 DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION Opinion of the Court opinion was based, does not compel unending adherence to Roe’s abuse of judicial authority.

 Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.

 It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. “The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations, upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.” Casey, 505 U. S., at 979 (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part). That is what the Constitution and the rule of law demand.”

  

Dobbs vs Jackson [ overturn Roe V. Wade ad Casey

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

 

Roe v. Wade

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/

 

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/505/833/

 

 Ray Gruszecki
June 24, 2022

No comments:

Post a Comment