Sunday, June 12, 2022

The Legality of the Biden Presidency

 

The Legality of the Biden Presidency

 The whole world has now blithely accepted that the 2020 presidential election, where the incompetent Joe Biden was elected out of his Delaware basement, was an honest and fair election.  Any opinions counter to this view are relegated to conspiracy theories and cuckoo land.

 At risk of Bill Barr’s “bullshit” epithet, I take this opportunity to remind everyone of how the “fix was in” to give the election to a manifestly incompetent Joe Biden.

 Even forgetting for moment, the still (IMHO) outstanding questions about the election itself, which are enumerated and discussed later, there is the question of suppression of news about Hunter Biden’s laptop just before the election.

 This aspect of “the fix” concerns the censorship and burying of the news about Hunter Biden’s laptop that the New York Post and a few other honest news outlets released just before the election.  If the news about Joe Biden’s involvement in the Biden crime family had been allowed to be released and not covered up, Joe Biden would never have become the president.

 

 This article is about Hunter Biden’s laptop, how it was covered up just before the election, and how miniscule was Biden’s electoral college margin of “victory” in several key swing states:

 Hunter’s Laptop and the Worst President Ever

 We not only have the most abysmal “president” and “vice president” ever, in our history, they should have never been there in the first place.

 The deep state, consisting of the left-wing politicians, much of the media, big tech and entertainment industry have made it seem as if this is some conspiracy theory or misplaced right-wing lie.  And the gullible American public has swallowed the propaganda that Joe Biden won the 2020 election fairly.  He would not have been elected if the content of Hunter Biden’s laptop was not suppressed

 Even after admitting that Hunter Biden’s laptop and its contents are real, this same cabal continues to hide news about it and denigrate its existence. And where is the FBI, who has had the laptop since December of 2019?

 Let’s remember, if the news about Hunter’s laptop was not suppressed by the above dishonest mob just before the 2020 election, Joe Biden would never have been elected.  All you have to do is look at the numbers.

 Biden won the electoral college in 2020 by 306 to 232, with 270 electoral votes necessary to win.  This included Arizona with 11 electoral votes with 10,457 winning popular votes; Georgia 10 electoral, 12,670 popular; Pennsylvania 20 electoral, 81,660 popular; Wisconsin 10 electoral, 20,682 popular.  These four states add up to 51 electoral votes, and would have given Trump a winning total of 283.  The total popular vote in the four states necessary to attain these 51 electoral votes would have been 125,469 out of the 18,360,000 total votes cast, or less than 7 tenths of one percent of the total votes cast in these states.

 It is pretty obvious that these small popular voter margins would have easily been overcome, and Trump would have been re-elected president, if the truth about Hunter Biden’s laptop had not been suppressed by our dishonest politicians, mainstream media and big tech.”

 

 Written right after the January 6, 2021demonstrations at the capitol.  The questions raised about the legality of the 2020 election have never been satisfactorily answered, IMHO, except by Bill Barr’s “bullshit” epithet, and just swept under the rug by numerous mostly democrat elected judges.

 “The “Legal” Presidential Election

 Increasingly, public opinion rules in this country, and public opinion is the result of the extremely biased left-wing broadcast and print media, and more and more of the big leftist West Coast tech giants and their algorithms acting as diverters and censors. The courts, the legislatures, and our executive seem to be inept echoes of public opinion. Our culture, our history, the very foundations of our country are changing from “one nation under God”, to a Godless, lawless, secular socialism.

 Now that the whole world is denouncing the actions of a few criminal elements who rioted and broke into the capitol building last Wednesday, January 6, and is associating this action to a speech that President Trump made earlier in the day, it is easy to lose perspective, and paint all of the 74 million people who voted for Trump with the same brush. Trump’s speech was about stealing the election, and demonstrating at the capitol in a peaceful and lawful manner.  Of course, our dishonest media left out this last part about being peaceful and lawful, and the speech itself has been taken down, so we can only read about the biased media’s propagandized version of it.

 All of a sudden, concerns about the rule changes, procedures and legality of the election are no longer questioned.  After all, a few right-wing kooks broke into the capitol, caused some mayhem, and this illegal activity is representative of the whole movement to question the legality of the election.  Heard over and over in the public opinion formed by the media propagandists and censors, is that the election was completely legal and free from fraud, and we’d better accept it and stop making noise about it.  The fact that a bunch of redneck right-wingers broke into the capitol proves it.

 But we should not forget the very valid points made by great numbers of both republicans and democrats about the legality of the election.  These points exist whether or not the courts adjudicated them.

 Various rule changes were rammed through before the 2020 presidential election by biased state courts in the swing states, rather than by state legislatures as defined in the federal constitution.  These apparently illicit rulings have resulted in election abuses, illegal actions, fraud and ballot seeding, both manually and by voting hardware/software, such that massive numbers of illegal votes were awarded to Joe Biden.  Early attempts to uphold State legislative hegemony over election rules rather than the executive or judiciary, have proven unsuccessful, all the way to SCOTUS,

 President Trump’s legal teams have disputed practices and results in several key states, and claimed chicanery and fraud, accumulating whistleblower testimony and myriad affidavits to that effect.  The state and circuit courts (some of whom passed the originally unconstitutional rule changes), so far have considered Trump’s cases anecdotal or too late, and claimed that an insufficient number of votes were affected to reverse the projected results showing Biden to be the winner.

 This summarizes the main points of the Trump challenge:

 Popular Vote totals in recent years

Obama 2008               69,499,428

Obama 2012               65,918,507

Trump 2016                62,985,153

Hillary 2016                65,853,677

Biden 2020                 80,074,510 ??

Trump 2020                73,861,985

 How could Biden, sitting in his basement for most of the campaign, receive 14-18 million more votes than Barrack Obama did in his two victorious years?

 House seats:  How could the republicans have picked up upwards of 10 house seats, most of the contested state houses and legislatures, and lost the presidency?

 How could Trump’s massive support in the primary vote not get translated into an election win, as in all previous elections?

 How could Biden underperform Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia, and in those big cities in swing states run by Democrats, alter the election in favor of Biden?

 How could Trump have been leading by hundreds of thousands of votes at around midnight of election night, and lose in six primarily democratically run states as ballots were dumped through the night?

 Why were legal republican poll watchers turned away in big city democrat precincts?

 Why were legal voters turned away on election day and told that they had already voted by mail?

 Why did so many dead people and out of state people vote?

 Why did more people vote than were registered in many democrat run large cities in swing states?

 Why are not the whistleblowers that have come forth not been taken at least as seriously as the anonymous whistleblower that was held so inviolable and resulted in a presidential impeachment?  There are many signed affidavits by eyewitness whistleblowers claiming a slew of illegal and fraudulent practices.

 To summarize, “the fix was in” by the democrats long before the election.  As result of unconstitutional rule changes in many democrat run states allowing all manner of illegal votes to be counted without proof of identity (dead people, out of state people, people voting multiple times) votes against Trump burgeoned.  As Trump and many of his followers claimed, the democrats stole the election.  It cannot be proven.  And, the democrats got away with it.  Of course, any attempt to voice these opinions after the break-in at capitol are met with derision and hoot-calls of “right wing kook”.

 That’s how public opinion works.  Its twisted all out of any semblance of truth by media propaganda and censorship, and punctuated by a few idiots that broke into the capitol, and did irreparably more harm that just defiling Nancy Pelosi’s desk.

 Ray Gruszecki
January 10, 2021”

Ray Gruszecki
June 12, 2022

No comments:

Post a Comment